PartyPoker = best?
 

Many says that partypoker has the best games because the players are so bad, is that true?

Or are there any other site that has worse players.

Ongame, full tilt , ultimate bet,??

Re: PartyPoker = best?
 

no Americans @ party....so what do you think?

Re: PartyPoker = best?
 

[ QUOTE ]
no Americans @ party....so what do you think?

[/ QUOTE ]

Don't know if you mean americans are good or bad [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

Re: PartyPoker = best?
 

I assume that you think americans are bad players so the players on partypoker are not to bad now?

Re: PartyPoker = best?
 

Are there worse players at Full Tilt?

Re: PartyPoker = best?
 

only true for the higher stakes

Re: PartyPoker = best?
 

Americans overall are better players. Party is prob softer then stars or FT.

Re: PartyPoker = best?
 

[ QUOTE ]
I assume that you think americans are bad players so the players on partypoker are not to bad now?

[/ QUOTE ]

Not at all. No Americans means far fewer players. Far fewer players = far fewer bad players.

The bigger the pool the more likely bad players will play, and the US is the most populous country in the world with extensive internet access. Now maybe in 5 or 10 years India and China will have a high percentage of people with fast internet connections, but until that happens, the US will be the biggest fish tank in the world.

Re: PartyPoker = best?
 

[ QUOTE ]
Americans overall are better players. Party is prob softer then stars or FT.

[/ QUOTE ]

We who are from Sweden thinks you Americans are fishes [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

Re: PartyPoker = best?
 

If you can play on Party and you don't, you are stupid.