Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-13-2006, 07:42 PM
raptor517 raptor517 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 7,453
Default (109) bubble donking against aggro sb.. 88

***** Hand History for Game 3365420789 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $100 Buy-in + $9 Entry Fee Trny:19168245 Level:7 Blinds(150/300) - Friday, January 13, 18:29:06 EDT 2006
Table Table 68251 (Real Money)
Seat 7 is the button
Total number of players : 4
Seat 2: pattiernan ( $6145 )
Seat 3: Raptor_517 ( $1535 )
Seat 6: shv99 ( $1305 )
Seat 7: bigchips1000 ( $1015 )
Trny:19168245 Level:7
Blinds(150/300)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Raptor_517 [ 8h 8c ]
shv99 folds.
bigchips1000 folds.
pattiernan raises [450].
Raptor_517 ???

haha i thought this wasnt too tough a choice.. DID I THINK WRONG?!?!?!???? vote away.. holla
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-13-2006, 07:45 PM
Jman28 Jman28 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Banana Thief
Posts: 4,101
Default Re: (109) bubble donking against aggro sb.. 88

Grinding the 109s? I'll prolly be doing that soon. Blackjack and MTTs are rigged in the Bahamas.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-13-2006, 07:46 PM
raptor517 raptor517 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 7,453
Default Re: (109) bubble donking against aggro sb.. 88

[ QUOTE ]
Grinding the 109s? I'll prolly be doing that soon. Blackjack and MTTs are rigged in the Bahamas.

[/ QUOTE ]

hellz yea. -22k and running worse than ever in my life = me not playing step 5s and step 4 highers anymore. yay for 109s and mtts. holla
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-13-2006, 07:58 PM
Apathy Apathy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,898
Default Re: (109) bubble donking against aggro sb.. 88

I would shove here. You probably have some folding equity even though you shouldnt and your hand is way ahead of his range. Also there is no real short stack and no guarentees folding will help you money.

The fact that the aggro bigstack is on your right and isnt moving anytime soon is also important.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:01 PM
McShove McShove is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: slummin\' it at 3/6 NL
Posts: 1,243
Default Re: (109) bubble donking against aggro sb.. 88

easy push, IMO
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:02 PM
laser16 laser16 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: hu
Posts: 1,168
Default Re: (109) bubble donking against aggro sb.. 88

I clicked fold I meant push
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:15 PM
costanza_g costanza_g is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: This is Morning Mist
Posts: 3,950
Default Re: (109) bubble donking against aggro sb.. 88

Well, I say push, but your polls are usually to show how incredibly wrong/stupid I am.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:16 PM
Myst Myst is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Providence
Posts: 1,175
Default Re: (109) bubble donking against aggro sb.. 88

[ QUOTE ]
I would shove here. You probably have some folding equity even though you shouldnt and your hand is way ahead of his range. Also there is no real short stack and no guarentees folding will help you money.

The fact that the aggro bigstack is on your right and isnt moving anytime soon is also important.

[/ QUOTE ]

What if the aggro big stack pushed all in? Do you still call?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:21 PM
Michael C. Michael C. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 489
Default Re: (109) bubble donking against aggro sb.. 88

I'd shove even if he had pushed. If he's agressive there has to be a huge chance he has at least one card under 8.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-13-2006, 08:41 PM
pineapple888 pineapple888 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Getting rivered by idiots
Posts: 6,558
Default Re: (109) bubble donking against aggro sb.. 88

It depends just how aggro he has been and what his raise means and if you think you have any FE.

For what it's worth, I voted "fold" before doing ICM because I don't trust his weird little raise, plus you are ahead of the other shorties and the blinds are coming their way, plus 88 isn't all that great a hand.

ICM says .305 call and win, .201 fold. 88 against any two is 69%. So you are ever so slightly +$EV against any two. If he has any raising standards at all here, you are -$EV, unless you think you have FE.

So, overall, I guess you just have to go with your read at the table.

P.S. It's not that easy after all [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.