Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 11-06-2007, 07:24 AM
eurythmech eurythmech is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Relocated East
Posts: 2,626
Default Re: Pushing ATC UTG <4 BB\'s

I def fold a few hands here. Especially in a tourney without antes. Putting 1/4 of your stack in the bb isn't horrible.
a number of beneficial scenarios can occur:

a) Other players clash this hand
b) Other players clash next hand before action gets to you
c) You pick up a hand
d) You get a walk
e) It gets limped to you

And even if not, we do have some FE in the sb next hand, and if that goes to hell, well then we do have a couple more hands to double up (having already lost a large portion of our stack, this sucks, but it's not the end of the world).
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 11-06-2007, 11:28 AM
darinvg darinvg is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Boston Area
Posts: 1,067
Default Re: Pushing ATC UTG <4 BB\'s

tl;dr
ATCs here is bad.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 11-06-2007, 11:34 AM
TruFloridaGator TruFloridaGator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boomer Sooner
Posts: 10,871
Default Re: Pushing ATC UTG <4 BB\'s

Moreover, 2300 is far from a disaster scenario. You're going to lose a lot of FE when we have to fold but we can usually get a +EV spot the rest of the STT.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 11-06-2007, 11:48 AM
tigerite tigerite is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 9,815
Default Re: Pushing ATC UTG <4 BB\'s

I can't believe people advocating shoving ATC here, it's terrible IMHO.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 11-06-2007, 11:56 AM
TruFloridaGator TruFloridaGator is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Boomer Sooner
Posts: 10,871
Default Re: Pushing ATC UTG <4 BB\'s

[ QUOTE ]
I can't believe people advocating shoving ATC here, it's terrible IMHO.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah it is
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 11-06-2007, 01:42 PM
marand marand is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 687
Default Re: Pushing ATC UTG <4 BB\'s

Nash equlibrium in this spot is something like 20% push.
http://www.holdemresources.net/hr/sngs/i...amp;s8=&amp;s9=

Push range:
CO - 19.8%, 22 AT KJ QJ A3s K8s Q8s J8s T8s 98s

With call ranges:
BTN - 6.8%, 88 AJ
SB - 10.0%, 55 AT A9s KQs
BB - 30.0%, 22 A2 K9 QT K5s Q9s J9s T9s

Two things to consider are:
* The nash equlibrium calling ranges are not what we are actually getting called with?
* We will be hit by BB next hand so our equity is less than ICM would suggest.

I think more realistic calling ranges are something like:
BTN - 12%, 44 A9 A7s KQs
SB - 15%, 33 A8 A4s KTs
BB - 40%, 22 A2 K3 Q9 JT K2s Q5s J8s T9s

If we plug those ranges into SngWiz we get the following:
Push range - 13%, 55 A9 KQ A7s KJs

But since we will be in BB next hand, this range is waaaay waaay too tight. If we turn on 'Simulate Future Games' then we get the following:
Push range - 42%, 22 A2 K5 Q9 J9 T9 K2s Q6s J7s T7s 97s 86s 76s 65s

I think that range is reasonable. I am probably one of the tighter players in this scenario and I would generally push slightly tighter than 40%. I would guess something like 35%.

Another thing to consider is:
* Are the other players on the bubble regulars?

If we are playing against 3 regulars and we push ATC from CO here. They will quickly pick up on that and we will be called very very wide. Thats obviously bad for us. So if two different ranges have about the same $EV we should pick the tighter range because of how our image will affect future games.

--- Cliff notes ---
I would push something like:
35%, 22 A2 K8 QT JT A2s K2s Q7s J7s T7s 97s 87s 76s
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.