Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-16-2007, 07:56 PM
solvine solvine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 201
Default NL 200 - 2 pair facing river shove

i have just started trying to take a shot at NL 200 again, and dont know if i am being too tight on this river

Full Tilt Poker, $1/$2 NL Hold'em Cash Game, 8 Players
LegoPoker Hand History Converter

BTN: $187
SB: $74.75
BB: $88
UTG: $42.75
UTG+1: $192.75
MP1: $198
Hero (MP2): $229.15
CO: $200

Pre-Flop: Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (MP2)
3 folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to $7</font>, CO calls $7, 3 folds

Flop: ($17) 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $12</font>, CO calls $12

Turn: ($41) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $30</font>, CO calls $30

River: ($101) K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (2 Players)
<font color="red">Hero bets $50</font>, <font color="red">CO raises to $151 and is All-In</font>, Hero folds

Results: $201 Pot ($3 Rake)
CO mucked and WON $198 (+$99 NET)

villain is solid reg who runs at 11.33/8.37/2.9

should i have c/c river???
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-16-2007, 09:04 PM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: NL 200 - 2 pair facing river shove

I would be bet/calling the river for like $68. I don't see this as being a good fold on the river at all since I can't see him showing up with any hands that beat you really. I mean, I guess 33 and 44 are in his range here, but seems like he has KQ here a lot and I really don't knw wtf else he shows up with besides air, but I don't get air either. This hand is very weird by him.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-16-2007, 09:45 PM
justscott justscott is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 410
Default Re: NL 200 - 2 pair facing river shove

Wouldnt a set raise you on the turn when the 2 diamonds come and the wheel draw. I call this.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-16-2007, 09:45 PM
solvine solvine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 201
Default Re: NL 200 - 2 pair facing river shove

i dont see what he is shoving here though???
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-16-2007, 09:46 PM
too eazy too eazy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: triple beam dreamin\'
Posts: 838
Default Re: NL 200 - 2 pair facing river shove

this is a set like 100% of the time.

however, your bet sizing means better players will shove this river with a lot of bluffs.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-16-2007, 09:50 PM
ncboiler ncboiler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,405
Default Re: NL 200 - 2 pair facing river shove

[ QUOTE ]
I would be bet/calling the river for like $68. I don't see this as being a good fold on the river at all since I can't see him showing up with any hands that beat you really. I mean, I guess 33 and 44 are in his range here, but seems like he has KQ here a lot and I really don't knw wtf else he shows up with besides air, but I don't get air either. This hand is very weird by him.

[/ QUOTE ]

I see this being K/Q but I don't know how this is weird if it is. You are thinking that he would raise the flop if he has K/Q?
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-16-2007, 10:03 PM
hielo_uno hielo_uno is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 243
Default Re: NL 200 - 2 pair facing river shove

his line is really doesnt make sense to me here. There is almost no way for him to have a diamond flush here, since the Qd is on the board. So its the question of whether he has a set here or not? If he is a solid reg, he would def. put a raise w/ the set on the flop or the turn.

The only hand villain holds here that make sense to me is KQ.

This is not a profitable situation tho, if you were taking a shot, i think folding is reasonable too.

Im also a NL200 reg at FTP, who is the villain here? maybe i'll have some notes on him.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-16-2007, 10:29 PM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: NL 200 - 2 pair facing river shove

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I would be bet/calling the river for like $68. I don't see this as being a good fold on the river at all since I can't see him showing up with any hands that beat you really. I mean, I guess 33 and 44 are in his range here, but seems like he has KQ here a lot and I really don't knw wtf else he shows up with besides air, but I don't get air either. This hand is very weird by him.

[/ QUOTE ]

I see this being K/Q but I don't know how this is weird if it is. You are thinking that he would raise the flop if he has K/Q?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. I'm saying that this line makes sense to me with exactly KQ and no other hands really. 3d4d is also realistic, but I'm not sure if thats in his range. Thats the only flush I can ever see him having though.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.