|
|
#1
08-21-2006, 03:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Squeeeeze
Which of any of these 3 do you like? Please give reasons of why you like/dislike: (no reads in all 3)
Party Poker No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $1/$2 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $389.33 UTG+1: $205.88 CO: $496.64 Button: $171.55 SB: $210.30 Hero: $207.15 Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] <font color="#cc0000">UTG raises to $8</font>, UTG+1 calls, CO folds, Button calls, SB folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $41</font> Party Poker No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $1/$2 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $378.65 UTG+1: $200 CO: $135.15 Button: $14.80 SB: $300.40 Hero: $248.55 Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] UTG folds, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 raises to $7</font>, CO calls, Button folds, SB calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $35</font> Party Poker No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $1/$2 6 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $197.30 UTG+1: $365.24 CO: $320.40 Button: $233 SB: $183.80 Hero: $200 Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] UTG folds, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises to $9</font>, Button calls, SB calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $47</font> 
|
|
#2
08-21-2006, 03:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Squeeeeze
no reads, i dont like squeezing UTG raises. the last one i love.
|
|
#3
08-21-2006, 03:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Squeeeeze
1. No. With no reads, I'd not get involved with a highly potentially dominated hand against an UTG raiser.
2. Not bad, though I suspect this is neutral to just calling and playing for set value. 3. Absolutely. That's my play very often, and you'll grab that dead money happily.
|
|
#4
08-21-2006, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Squeeeeze
[ QUOTE ]
1. No. With no reads, I'd not get involved with a highly potentially dominated hand against an UTG raiser. 2. Not bad, though I suspect this is neutral to just calling and playing for set value. 3. Absolutely. That's my play very often, and you'll grab that dead money happily. [/ QUOTE ] Exactly how I rank them, 3>>>2>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>1
|
|
#5
08-21-2006, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Squeeeeze
I agree with carnival. I REALLY hate the second hand because you kill implied odds for a set.
|
|
#6
08-21-2006, 03:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Squeeeeze
In my experiences, squeezing is much more effective when there is only 2 people in the pot, ex. UTG raises, Button calls, We 3bet in the BB.
I just think that in the last 2, especially, it would be better to call and play a multiway pot. Just my opinion. Edit: Yes, you are getting more dead money in the pot but with these last 2 hands I would rather see a flop.
|
|
#7
08-21-2006, 03:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Squeeeeze
Hand 1 is the only one I don't like. If called you are in a tough spot if you don't hit the flop hard...
In hand 1 are you CBetting ANY flop? Hand 2 and 3 are great especially with all the dead money.
|
|
#8
08-21-2006, 03:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Squeeeeze
Exactly how I rank them, 3>>>2>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>&g t;>>1
|
|
#9
08-21-2006, 03:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Squeeeeze
1) Bad. Against 2 early raisers. Plus theirs no such thing as a good flop against a caller. Bad reverse implied odds. Might as well do it, then with any two cards.
2) fine. but calling is proably just as +EV. 3) sexy.
|
|
#10
08-21-2006, 03:36 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Squeeeeze
[ QUOTE ]
1) Bad. Against 2 early raisers. Plus theirs no such thing as a good flop against a caller. Bad reverse implied odds. Might as well do it, then with any two cards. 2) fine. but calling is proably just as +EV. 3) sexy. [/ QUOTE ] DB, I pwned this thread, obv. Please come up with hands that are not so standard kthx.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
