Squeeeeze
 

Which of any of these 3 do you like? Please give reasons of why you like/dislike: (no reads in all 3)


Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $1/$2
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $389.33
UTG+1: $205.88
CO: $496.64
Button: $171.55
SB: $210.30
Hero: $207.15

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]
<font color="#cc0000">UTG raises to $8</font>, UTG+1 calls, CO folds, Button calls, SB folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $41</font>





Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $1/$2
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $378.65
UTG+1: $200
CO: $135.15
Button: $14.80
SB: $300.40
Hero: $248.55

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with 9[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
UTG folds, <font color="#cc0000">UTG+1 raises to $7</font>, CO calls, Button folds, SB calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $35</font>





Party Poker
No Limit Holdem Ring game
Blinds: $1/$2
6 players
Converter

Stack sizes:
UTG: $197.30
UTG+1: $365.24
CO: $320.40
Button: $233
SB: $183.80
Hero: $200

Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is BB with 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
UTG folds, UTG+1 calls, <font color="#cc0000">CO raises to $9</font>, Button calls, SB calls, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $47</font>

Re: Squeeeeze
 

no reads, i dont like squeezing UTG raises. the last one i love.

Re: Squeeeeze
 

1. No. With no reads, I'd not get involved with a highly potentially dominated hand against an UTG raiser.

2. Not bad, though I suspect this is neutral to just calling and playing for set value.

3. Absolutely. That's my play very often, and you'll grab that dead money happily.

Re: Squeeeeze
 

[ QUOTE ]
1. No. With no reads, I'd not get involved with a highly potentially dominated hand against an UTG raiser.

2. Not bad, though I suspect this is neutral to just calling and playing for set value.

3. Absolutely. That's my play very often, and you'll grab that dead money happily.

[/ QUOTE ]

Exactly how I rank them, 3&gt;&gt;&gt;2&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;1

Re: Squeeeeze
 

I agree with carnival. I REALLY hate the second hand because you kill implied odds for a set.

Re: Squeeeeze
 

In my experiences, squeezing is much more effective when there is only 2 people in the pot, ex. UTG raises, Button calls, We 3bet in the BB.

I just think that in the last 2, especially, it would be better to call and play a multiway pot. Just my opinion.

Edit: Yes, you are getting more dead money in the pot but with these last 2 hands I would rather see a flop.

Re: Squeeeeze
 

Hand 1 is the only one I don't like. If called you are in a tough spot if you don't hit the flop hard...

In hand 1 are you CBetting ANY flop?

Hand 2 and 3 are great especially with all the dead money.

Re: Squeeeeze
 

Exactly how I rank them, 3&gt;&gt;&gt;2&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt; &gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&gt;&g t;&gt;&gt;1

Re: Squeeeeze
 

1) Bad. Against 2 early raisers. Plus theirs no such thing as a good flop against a caller. Bad reverse implied odds. Might as well do it, then with any two cards.

2) fine. but calling is proably just as +EV.

3) sexy.

Re: Squeeeeze
 

[ QUOTE ]
1) Bad. Against 2 early raisers. Plus theirs no such thing as a good flop against a caller. Bad reverse implied odds. Might as well do it, then with any two cards.

2) fine. but calling is proably just as +EV.

3) sexy.

[/ QUOTE ]

DB,

I pwned this thread, obv.

Please come up with hands that are not so standard kthx.