Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Poker Discussion > Brick and Mortar
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-03-2007, 01:48 PM
Warteen Warteen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Warteen For Mod \'08
Posts: 1,211
Default Time charge vs. rake in Vegas poker rooms

I'm heading to Vegas in August and want to play some poker there (probably 1/2 NL). Lately I've turned a decent profit at the local "charity" game in Lansing by buying in with a short stack and playing super-tight until someone doubles me up (or busts me out, in which case I repeat step one). A large part of the reason I can do this is because, unlike the only casino cardroom I've been to, the rake is taken from pots, not directly from player stacks.

My question is this: In Vegas, how many of the poker rooms do a time charge instead of a pot rake? Is there any hope for tight, shortstack play?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-03-2007, 02:12 PM
psandman psandman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Vegas
Posts: 2,346
Default Re: Time charge vs. rake in Vegas poker rooms

None of thegas rooms take time on a $1/$2 game. I think the lowest NL game I have seen on a time charge is $5-$10 at the Venetian.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-03-2007, 02:55 PM
KipBond KipBond is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,725
Default Re: Time charge vs. rake in Vegas poker rooms

[ QUOTE ]
A large part of the reason I can do this is because, unlike the only casino cardroom I've been to, the rake is taken from pots, not directly from player stacks.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] Rake has to be taken from the pot. And I don't think that's a good reason to play short-stack-push poker, anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-03-2007, 03:20 PM
Warteen Warteen is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Warteen For Mod \'08
Posts: 1,211
Default Re: Time charge vs. rake in Vegas poker rooms

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A large part of the reason I can do this is because, unlike the only casino cardroom I've been to, the rake is taken from pots, not directly from player stacks.

[/ QUOTE ]

[img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img] Rake has to be taken from the pot. And I don't think that's a good reason to play short-stack-push poker, anyway.

[/ QUOTE ]

The real reason I do it is because the full $200 buy-in is not really disposable income for me. That, and with the fish at the live games I've been to, it's very easy to get a $50 call when you're packing a big hand.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-04-2007, 11:32 AM
Cactus Jack Cactus Jack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Somewhere on the Strip
Posts: 1,423
Default Re: Time charge vs. rake in Vegas poker rooms

Most places have a $100 min buyin. Second, if a full buyin isn't disposable income to you, you aren't going to have much fun in Vegas. It's an expensive place.

Between the suckouts and the sharks and the lack of implied odds, short stack isn't a good strategy out here.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-04-2007, 12:45 PM
schwerd2 schwerd2 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Atlantic City
Posts: 484
Default Re: Time charge vs. rake in Vegas poker rooms

[ QUOTE ]
the full $200 buy-in is not really disposable income for me.

[/ QUOTE ]

quit poker
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.