|
|
#1
10-09-2007, 09:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
NLTRN - Very weak cbet against all-in status shortie
He has been very passive player but he has reached that point where he likes to shove. I assume he has reached a point where he feels a little more comfortable (stack-wise) because he has been limping hands lately. His preflop call here preflop I assume is weak.
Full Tilt Poker Game #3807741321: $55 + $2.50 Heads Up Sit & Go (29002375), Table 1 - 20/40 - No Limit Hold'em - 21:49:14 ET - 2007/10/09 Seat 1: sponce257 (470) Seat 2: xSCWx (2,530) xSCWx posts the small blind of 20 sponce257 posts the big blind of 40 The button is in seat #2 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to xSCWx [A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 4[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]] xSCWx raises to 120 sponce257 calls 80 *** FLOP *** [7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]] sponce257 checks xSCWx bets 90 --- My thinking is that regardless of if I do 90 or 160, he has to dedicate his whole stack in order to play the hand. Is there anything better to do? 
|
|
#2
10-09-2007, 10:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - Very weak cbet against all-in status shortie
I hate this situation, and I don't know what else you could do. With so much paint on the board, I would rather check it down. I wouldn't give him credit for bluffing right now, and I wouldn't want to see him with more chips.
|
|
#3
10-09-2007, 10:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - Very weak cbet against all-in status shortie
I'd rather shove preflop than play this hand. It's got good shoveablity (word?), but little playability. I would also try to check this down.
|
|
#4
10-09-2007, 10:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - Very weak cbet against all-in status shortie
I disagree with shoving. Sounds like the villain is going to fold trouble hands anyways, no point getting the worst of it with all the chips in the middle.
|
|
#7
10-09-2007, 11:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - Very weak cbet against all-in status shortie
[ QUOTE ]
Are you folding if he shoves over your pf raise? If not, I prefer just shoving. [/ QUOTE ] I intended to call a shove, but I think he has a wider range shoving over my bet than he does calling my shove.
|
|
#8
10-09-2007, 11:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - Very weak cbet against all-in status shortie
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Are you folding if he shoves over your pf raise? If not, I prefer just shoving. [/ QUOTE ] I intended to call a shove, but I think he has a wider range shoving over my bet than he does calling my shove. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think this is true, since he should know he has no FE here. If he'll see more strength in a shove than a normal raise, then I guess so. Most people won't, though.
|
|
#9
10-09-2007, 11:17 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - Very weak cbet against all-in status shortie
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Are you folding if he shoves over your pf raise? If not, I prefer just shoving. [/ QUOTE ] I intended to call a shove, but I think he has a wider range shoving over my bet than he does calling my shove. [/ QUOTE ] I don't think this is true, since he should know he has no FE here. If he'll see more strength in a shove than a normal raise, then I guess so. Most people won't, though. [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure he has no idea what fold equity is. I think the fact that he is making a "shove" instead of a "call" broadens his range.
|
|
#10
10-09-2007, 11:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: NLTRN - Very weak cbet against all-in status shortie
In that case, it's alright. I assumed a 55er would be better than that [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img].
Keep in mind I'm used to FR SNGs, so my instinct is to shove the [censored] out of everything when I'm in the SB. So I'm probably a bit too aggressive here.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
