Unity and Trinity Contradiction

[chezlaw]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
We've had these strange ideas before, never got them sorted. Logic is about meanings. If by saying the flood happened I mean that it rained a lot then if follows that there wasn't a drought going on at the time.

Logicaly it cant rain that much and there be a lack of water. To say otherwise is just to argue about the meaning of words.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm guessing your sort of hinting that your attached to the "law of noncontradiction". dialethic logic rejects this law and both Hegel in his "science of logic", and later dialethic thought provides cogent arguments for doubting its universal validity.
Not that its a bad inferential rule when your driving, and making deduction about the existence or non-existence of other cars. It's just that there may be situations where this does not apply.

If on the other hand your simply as the actual wording of your post suggests suggesting an adherence to the law of the excluded middle, then intiutionalistic logic which rejects this, may provide a more useful paradigm for modeling human reasoning.

[/ QUOTE ]
Are you saying that the holy trinity is possible on the same basis that it can be true that there is no water about during a flood (of water).

chez