Someone please explain it to me (some old stats of CTS)

[Barrin6]

[ QUOTE ]
the question you all should really be thinking about is

how do you beat an unbeatable player?

and then you will understand

[/ QUOTE ]

[aislephive]

[ QUOTE ]
the question you all should really be thinking about is

how do you beat an unbeatable player?

and then you will understand

[/ QUOTE ]

Well if you try to beat CTS and can't, clearly if you don't try you will.
[/expert game theory]

[poker12]

[ QUOTE ]
Or you can get coached by me for $60/hr since I have ran 10+ptbb at nl 200 for 7k hands running at cts's stats.

[/ QUOTE ]

just...awesome

[PBJaxx]

[ QUOTE ]
Try this instead :
"Too read dependent" - "If he plays in way X you may try Y"
"no absolutes in poekr " - "if Y then X works and Y doesnt"
"does not translate into what many want to filter through the poker vacuum" - "I noticed that he plays 54s more often than ATo and hes firing 2nd barrels on Axxx boards quite often".

See the diffrence ?
Sentences on the right actually mean something while sentences on the left are meaningless patter.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is good stuff. Gogogogo Punter.

[DonButtons]

Interesting. That % is high.

I wonder what his recent % is.

Ive experimented with a similar range but it was hard playing oop soo much.

45s up, all pairs, all suited broadways, KJo+, ATo+, A2s up. Then throw in a random j9s, k8s a certain % of the time.

[Christophers]

Awesome thread, really.

[pp262]

That amazes me a lot is his high W$WSF given his high VP$IP.

[jlocdog]

[ QUOTE ]
Awesome thread, really.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed. I know I've learned a lot about getting pwnt [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]