#41
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk
[ QUOTE ]
To me, AT is much more likely than A2. I don't see A2 raising preflop from that spot, and I've seen weird slowplays like this a ton at these stakes. For me, likelihood goes AT, TT, then JJ. He could also feasibly play AK like this, imo. [/ QUOTE ] A2 is there a lot... and yes, A2 is raising all the time opening from the CO. |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] To me, AT is much more likely than A2. I don't see A2 raising preflop from that spot, and I've seen weird slowplays like this a ton at these stakes. For me, likelihood goes AT, TT, then JJ. He could also feasibly play AK like this, imo. [/ QUOTE ] A2 is there a lot... and yes, A2 is raising all the time opening from the CO. [/ QUOTE ] huh? I know a lot of LAG/TAGs that instafold A2o in the CO. I agree with Miles and BBB, this is a very easy and trivial raise. |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] To me, AT is much more likely than A2. I don't see A2 raising preflop from that spot, and I've seen weird slowplays like this a ton at these stakes. For me, likelihood goes AT, TT, then JJ. He could also feasibly play AK like this, imo. [/ QUOTE ] A2 is there a lot... and yes, A2 is raising all the time opening from the CO. [/ QUOTE ] huh? I know a lot of LAG/TAGs that instafold A2o in the CO. I agree with Miles and BBB, this is a very easy and trivial raise. [/ QUOTE ] I agree as well that this is a simple raise.. If you know LAGs that are not opening A2 here, then they are not LAGs. Many TAGs will open it as well. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk
[ QUOTE ]
If you know LAGs that are not opening A2 here, then they are not LAGs. Many TAGs will open it as well. [/ QUOTE ] I guess it depends on how you define a LAG/TAG. So this is pretty silly do discuss. But by LAG/TAG I mean your typical 30/20 player in 6max. I know plenty of those that will muck A2o-A4o in the CO. |
|
|