|
|
#31
07-22-2007, 05:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200NL 6max Combo Draw bet/3bet?
Look, sometimes in a hand we make a bet with the intention of responding in a certain way. Occasionally other factors may make us want to change our plan since a better line has presented itself. This does not make our initial bet wrong.
|
|
#32
07-22-2007, 05:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL 6max Combo Draw bet/3bet?
[ QUOTE ]
If you want to play it passive, then that's up to you. But why would you lead if you are NOT going to assume you have good POT equity?!?! [/ QUOTE ] Dude, handreading.
|
|
#33
07-22-2007, 05:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL 6max Combo Draw bet/3bet?
[ QUOTE ]
Look, sometimes in a hand we make a bet with the intention of responding in a certain way. Occasionally other factors may make us want to change our plan since a better line has presented itself. This does not make our initial bet wrong. [/ QUOTE ] Well, what was the plan, and how did the events change accordingly?
|
|
#34
07-22-2007, 05:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL 6max Combo Draw bet/3bet?
yeah, the fe is what makes these draws profitable, and i don't think we have much of it here. that being said pushing isn't a big deal.
|
|
#35
07-22-2007, 05:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL 6max Combo Draw bet/3bet?
i think a main factor is that a larger flush draw is def amoungst the ranges here.
|
|
#36
07-22-2007, 05:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL 6max Combo Draw bet/3bet?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Look, sometimes in a hand we make a bet with the intention of responding in a certain way. Occasionally other factors may make us want to change our plan since a better line has presented itself. This does not make our initial bet wrong. [/ QUOTE ] Well, what was the plan, and how did the events change accordingly? [/ QUOTE ] 3bet most of the time when there is a single raise, a call then a raise etc. Get money in the pot with very good equity when just called on the flop. Sometimes fold out better hands.
|
|
#37
07-22-2007, 05:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL 6max Combo Draw bet/3bet?
[ QUOTE ]
i think a main factor is that a larger flush draw is def amoungst the ranges here. [/ QUOTE ] KQ/QJ/JT [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] are certainly possible...which again makes the argument for 3-betting > calling.
|
|
#38
07-22-2007, 05:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL 6max Combo Draw bet/3bet?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If you want to play it passive, then that's up to you. But why would you lead if you are NOT going to assume you have good POT equity?!?! [/ QUOTE ] Dude, handreading. [/ QUOTE ] If you put the tight guy on a set, then all our pairs and pair and trip-draws become worthless. If you put the tight guy on a flushdraw, then we are very often dominated. However, if you put one of them on a higher flushdraw, then we are in good shape if we gogogo. It's hard to call off your stack with a flushdraw when you're likely up to a set/two pair AND we already have a pair, if they do decide to call (= we are ahead). Also, I provided a handrange, against which we are 49%. So I don't see how your handrange analysis changes the plan?
|
|
#39
07-22-2007, 05:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL 6max Combo Draw bet/3bet?
Forget my previous post - I didn't see BTN cold call the flop bets...
His range definitely includes broadway hearts... I think I call here and re-evaluate on turn....
|
|
#40
07-22-2007, 05:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200NL 6max Combo Draw bet/3bet?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] i think a main factor is that a larger flush draw is def amoungst the ranges here. [/ QUOTE ] KQ/QJ/JT [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] are certainly possible...which again makes the argument for 3-betting > calling. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, if we had Kh9h it would be a call for sure, different situation here. I'm edging towards a 3b.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
