#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Royals will go at least .500 in 2006 Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] bump [/ QUOTE ] bump this thread when they are .500 after 4 games. until then (keep dreaming), don't do it . [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] HA! i forgot to bump this but they were .500 after 4 games. In your face |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Royals will go at least .500 in 2006 Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] bump [/ QUOTE ] bump this thread when they are .500 after 4 games. until then (keep dreaming), don't do it . [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] HA! i forgot to bump this but they were .500 after 4 games. In your face [/ QUOTE ] yeah but you didn't think they would be either. so in YOUR face. you said: "i can't do that because they won't be. Maybe .500 in the pre-season " lol. If they hadn't gone .500 over their four games you would have just let it die. |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Royals will go at least .500 in 2006 Thread***
no i would have still bumped this. i just havent been around in about a month. it just helped that they were 2-2 after those games. and you are correct, i didn't think they would be; but now, WATCH OUT! they're going to win the pennant!!!!!!!!!!
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Royals will go at least .500 in 2006 Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
WATCH OUT! they're going to win the pennant!!!!!!!!!! [/ QUOTE ] i'll bet you that they don't. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Royals will go at least .500 in 2006 Thread***
good luck Royals (even though I'm a Cards fan)
I'm named after George Brett and I enjoyed how the Royals used to be competitive before Steinbrenner's pockets ruined MLB |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Royals will go at least .500 in 2006 Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
good luck Royals (even though I'm a Cards fan) I'm named after George Brett and I enjoyed how the Royals used to be competitive before Steinbrenner's pockets ruined MLB [/ QUOTE ] Steinbrenner is one of the few owners who actually loses money to field a great team, compared to teams like the Devil Rays who could spend more than they do but would rather just hoard it for the owner. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Royals will go at least .500 in 2006 Thread***
Gosh, Crow...
Have they dumped something psychedelic into the Missouri River? I just posted a response to a delusional post by a desperate Chiefs supporter. Now you're having Royals fantasies? My family has had season baseball tickets since the A's played their first game in KC. Believe me, pal. The party's over. And Ewing Kaufmann saw it coming long ago. Simple market economics, given the MLB structure. Add in under-motivated, absentee ownership and incompetent management and you've got a Triple AAA operation. I'd imagine the T-Bones are far better value... |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Royals will go at least .500 in 2006 Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] WATCH OUT! they're going to win the pennant!!!!!!!!!! [/ QUOTE ] i'll bet you that they don't. [/ QUOTE ] that is a bet that i will not take. |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Royals will go at least .500 in 2006 Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I have you guys beat. I was an Expos fan. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] 1994 World Series Runners Up To the Cleveland Indians! /quote] |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ***Official Royals will go at least .500 in 2006 Thread***
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] good luck Royals (even though I'm a Cards fan) I'm named after George Brett and I enjoyed how the Royals used to be competitive before Steinbrenner's pockets ruined MLB [/ QUOTE ] Steinbrenner is one of the few owners who actually loses money to field a great team, compared to teams like the Devil Rays who could spend more than they do but would rather just hoard it for the owner. [/ QUOTE ] Steinbrenner makes money on the Yankees, but he takes less of a cut from the profit as compared to most owners. He's a fan's owner, for sure. The Devil Rays aren't the best example of this, as their owners are fairly decent actually. It's the Marlins (Loria) that you are probably thinking of. |
|
|