Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:39 PM
RoyalFarmer RoyalFarmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 54
Default Re:

I think against an average shortstack, who pushes against your raise (you raised from MP, from UTG it would be differently, since the shortstack must put you on a bigger hand) you can call with AK and JJ+.
AQ is -EV, because there is no hand you are a favorite against. Maybe AJ, but it's questionable if the Shorty would push with that.
JJ is slightly +EV, if you believe the Shorty would push with AQ as well, otherwise, you're dominated most of the time.
QQ is +EV, since you dominate JJ and AQ, are a slight favorite against AK and only against KK and AA in a bad shape.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:40 PM
Sandviper23 Sandviper23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pokerstars
Posts: 417
Default Re: Perfect Example

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Villain is a clear 5.1/4.8/3 with 273 hands.

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $545.10
BB: $106.90
UTG: $49.00
UTG+1: $100.00
Sandviper23 (MP1): $205.35
MP2: $17.00
MP3: $62.55
CO: $35.80
BTN: $58.50

Preflop: Sandviper23 is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (9 Players)
2 folds, <font color="red">Sandviper23 raises to $4.00</font>, <font color="red">MP2 raises all-in to $17.00</font>, 5 folds, Sandviper23 calls $13.00

Flop: ($35.50) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

Turn: ($35.50) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

River: ($35.50) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

Pot Size: $35.50 ($35.50 Rake)

MP2 had A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (a pair of Aces) and LOST (-$17.00)
Sandviper23 had A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (a pair of Kings) and LOST (-$17.00)

[/ QUOTE ]

wait, you are telling me that AA is in his range when he RR's preflop

am I getting this right?

wow I think I learned something new today, I'm pumped, I'm going to just start folding KK everytime I get RR because well he could have AA and man that would suck

ps 273 hands doesn't tell you that much about VPIP and PFR, he could easily be running 4-5% below normal, also could easily have not had AA/KK/QQ in that sample either

[/ QUOTE ]

This hand was dealt to me about 5 minutes ago, so after i read everything from the post

I think that i made the RIGHT call based on everything i read here
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:46 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re:

[ QUOTE ]
AQ is -EV, because there is no hand you are a favorite against. Maybe AJ, but it's questionable if the Shorty would push with that.

[/ QUOTE ]

its not about being a favorite, its about having &gt;breakeven equity(hint breakeven is going to be less than 50%) this is basic pot odds stuff

AQs is a close fold vs JJ+ AQ+ and a call vs most wider ranges
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 09-19-2007, 01:19 PM
RoyalFarmer RoyalFarmer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 54
Default Re:

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
AQ is -EV, because there is no hand you are a favorite against. Maybe AJ, but it's questionable if the Shorty would push with that.

[/ QUOTE ]

its not about being a favorite, its about having &gt;breakeven equity(hint breakeven is going to be less than 50%) this is basic pot odds stuff

AQs is a close fold vs JJ+ AQ+ and a call vs most wider ranges

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, let's do some math.

The pot odds are 1 to 1,6 (you raised to 4 BB and Button pushed with 20 BB).

Possible holdings of the shortstack are: AQ+ and JJ+

Makes a total of 46 hand combinations (16 for AK, 9 for AQ, 6 for each pair except QQ (only 3 left)).
Against KK and QQ you're about a 29% dog. (9 Combinations)
Against JJ you're a 45% dog (6)
Against AQ you're splitting the pot in most cases. (9)
Against Ak you're a 24% dog. (16)
Against AA you're a 7,5% dog. (6)

Putting AK and KK+QQ together, youre a 26% dog against 25 combinations, which represent 54 % of the possible holdings.

0.54x0.26 = 0,14 chance of winning

JJ represents only 13%. 0.13x0.45 = 0,06 chance of winning

AA as well 13%. 0.13x.0.075 = 0,01 chance of winning

AQ = 0.2x0.5 (splitpot=0,5) = 0,1 chance of winning

All in all you have a 31% of winning given the range of hands described above.

So in 100 Hands, you'll win 31x 1.6= 49.6 and lose 69x1= 69

As it turns out to call a push with AQ against a tight shortstack is -EV.
If the shorty is loose and your raise came from the button, things look differently.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 09-19-2007, 01:43 PM
BigBiceps BigBiceps is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,571
Default Re:

JJ+ and usually AK.

It also depends on how the short stack views you and your raises.

so that could tighten up to QQ+ and usually AK.

Anyone who is calling with AQ vs a shortstack is bad, but reraising with it has some merit vs a late position short stack raise.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 09-19-2007, 02:48 PM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re:

lol, this thread is so funny. This is why its profitable to SS. I mean, you guys are supposed to all be regulars (so at least mediocre and in some cases good) and you all have no idea what you're talking about with the calling ranges. Please fold AK and AQ.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 09-19-2007, 02:53 PM
Cry Me A River Cry Me A River is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 4,866
Default Re:

If shorties range is as tight as JJ+/AQ+ and you're going to call with AQ, you should also be calling with 22.

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 33.065% 21.17% 11.89% 14139145 7941942.50 { AcQd }
Hand 1: 66.935% 55.04% 11.89% 36756826 7941942.50 { JJ+, AQs+, AQo+ }

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 37.365% 37.07% 00.29% 35549760 279530.00 { 2c2d }
Hand 1: 62.635% 62.34% 00.29% 59780204 279530.00 { JJ+, AQs+, AQo+ }


If shorties range is even a little wider, AJ+/TT+ then AQ does significantly better:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 42.491% 33.73% 08.76% 32922314 8549558.00 { AcQd }
Hand 1: 57.509% 48.75% 08.76% 47579898 8549558.00 { TT+, AJs+, AJo+ }

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 38.750% 38.46% 00.29% 51361506 392694.00 { 2c2d }
Hand 1: 61.250% 60.96% 00.29% 81412818 392694.00 { TT+, AJs+, AJo+ }


One thing not mentioned is the value in busting out a short stack (particularly a decent short stack) who may be replaced by a full stack. This may be worth a marginally -ev call like AQ vs the tight push.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 09-19-2007, 02:57 PM
Hklm8383 Hklm8383 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,062
Default Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack

i call them with 10 7 and try to suck out them

( so they DIEIDIEIDEIDIEIDIEDIEDIE )

espicially mtg
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 09-19-2007, 03:04 PM
CalledDownLight CalledDownLight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: burning money in non-ring games
Posts: 4,541
Default Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack

You called me with KK after 3betting me 2 straight hands when I was btn and then SB on your right and then tried to tell me that you never bluff after I typed "ship it to steeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeez" in chat. I however, don't believe you and will continue to assault your blinds since you were just lucky enough to get two good hands in a row.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 09-19-2007, 03:09 PM
Sandviper23 Sandviper23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pokerstars
Posts: 417
Default Re:

[ QUOTE ]
If shorties range is as tight as JJ+/AQ+ and you're going to call with AQ, you should also be calling with 22.

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 33.065% 21.17% 11.89% 14139145 7941942.50 { AcQd }
Hand 1: 66.935% 55.04% 11.89% 36756826 7941942.50 { JJ+, AQs+, AQo+ }

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 37.365% 37.07% 00.29% 35549760 279530.00 { 2c2d }
Hand 1: 62.635% 62.34% 00.29% 59780204 279530.00 { JJ+, AQs+, AQo+ }


If shorties range is even a little wider, AJ+/TT+ then AQ does significantly better:

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 42.491% 33.73% 08.76% 32922314 8549558.00 { AcQd }
Hand 1: 57.509% 48.75% 08.76% 47579898 8549558.00 { TT+, AJs+, AJo+ }

equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 38.750% 38.46% 00.29% 51361506 392694.00 { 2c2d }
Hand 1: 61.250% 60.96% 00.29% 81412818 392694.00 { TT+, AJs+, AJo+ }


One thing not mentioned is the value in busting out a short stack (particularly a decent short stack) who may be replaced by a full stack. This may be worth a marginally -ev call like AQ vs the tight push.

[/ QUOTE ]

True, whether the SS busts or doubles up, he is leaving shortly.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.