Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 05-13-2007, 04:40 PM
Lucky Lucky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,694
Default Re: AQs against a nit. I play like [censored]

rr pf for sure. This guy not only has a wide opening range in CO, he's folding to your 3 bet a ton. It's true that if called by this guy, I would rather have 56s than AQ, but the bottom line is line AQ isn't horrible against his range and you want to take it down right there. So I think agaisnt a nit, rr > folding > calling. On the other hand, if nit raises UTG, i fold AQ in blinds for sure.

As far as how hand went, c/c flop is good. I prob b/f turn. This nit is not bluff raising you on turn, so you can safely fold if raise. He'll probably call KQ/QJ and look to check down river.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 05-13-2007, 05:11 PM
bilbo-san bilbo-san is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: In ur game, pickin off ur bluffz
Posts: 4,103
Default Re: AQs against a nit. I play like [censored]

[ QUOTE ]
rr pf for sure. This guy not only has a wide opening range in CO, he's folding to your 3 bet a ton. It's true that if called by this guy, I would rather have 56s than AQ

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a common urban myth I hear about all the freaking time, and it is horribly misguided.

If he calls he has a PP a huge % of the time. Being able to spike the Ace is worth WAY more than the tiny % chance you will flop two-pair or trips vs. the pocket pair that dominates you.

If you flop an A-high board, you don't have to go broke, and indeed it is pretty [censored] unlikely that your opponent wants to go broke with an unimproved PP on an A-high board, so you need to stop and think about how you should play A-high boards.

And if you flop nothing and c-bet and get called, which do you think is better, turning a pair of 5s or turning a pair of queens or Aces. Stop and think about your opponent's range if he calls your c-bet before you answer this question.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 05-13-2007, 06:49 PM
Lucky Lucky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,694
Default Re: AQs against a nit. I play like [censored]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
rr pf for sure. This guy not only has a wide opening range in CO, he's folding to your 3 bet a ton. It's true that if called by this guy, I would rather have 56s than AQ

[/ QUOTE ]

This is a common urban myth I hear about all the freaking time, and it is horribly misguided.

If he calls he has a PP a huge % of the time. Being able to spike the Ace is worth WAY more than the tiny % chance you will flop two-pair or trips vs. the pocket pair that dominates you.

If you flop an A-high board, you don't have to go broke, and indeed it is pretty [censored] unlikely that your opponent wants to go broke with an unimproved PP on an A-high board, so you need to stop and think about how you should play A-high boards.

And if you flop nothing and c-bet and get called, which do you think is better, turning a pair of 5s or turning a pair of queens or Aces. Stop and think about your opponent's range if he calls your c-bet before you answer this question.

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Against a 21/17 i agree. We're talking about a 13/9 here. Especially if he views you as tight and you have no big history with him.

If he calls your pf rr and calls your flop bet on A high flop (especially if you make flop bet a biggish 75-80%), you're in trouble. He's folding non ace big pairs a ton. This is a guy you can muscle off his big pairs. That's why 56s is fine. On the other hand, with low board that hits you hard, he'll pay off with his QQ-AA pretty quick.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.