Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 03-29-2007, 04:43 PM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: omfg
Posts: 9,677
Default Re: Hmm, let\'s call this a marginal 87o hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Your hand has no showdown value without pairing up.

[/ QUOTE ]

neither does his!

[/ QUOTE ]

Neither does a hand like JTs or QJs etc.

I think SD value is overrated.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 03-29-2007, 04:43 PM
thepizzlefosho thepizzlefosho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: not winning at SD
Posts: 895
Default Re: Hmm, let\'s call this a marginal 87o hand

[ QUOTE ]
Preflop whatever.

I can't fold this flop closing the action, call and fold turn UI.

[/ QUOTE ]

+1
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 03-29-2007, 04:57 PM
Scorcho Scorcho is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 684
Default Re: Hmm, let\'s call this a marginal 87o hand

[ QUOTE ]
Scorcho,

It would be more helpful if you elaborated with some explicit reasons on why you think 87o is a bad limp. I personally like it because SB is a TAG, so will not often raise without fairly good hands, and if he does, you have position. BB is loose and passive, so BB will not often raise. And with a loose passive and maniac in the pot, you have good implied odds when you hit.

I don't like to raise because it costs more. It bloats the pot making the bad plays the maniac and the loose passive will make into not as bad plays. And maniacs love to reraise and bluff in raised pots.

Against a different player I might raise, but against this guy, and with the SB and BB as they are, I like a limp. Of course, I may be thinking about this incorrectly, but simply just saying "you are wrong" does not make it so.

[/ QUOTE ]

I feel it's fairly obvious which is why I didn't elaborate but I will since you asked me to.

While having position on a field is great in poker, having no idea with any reasonable certainty what 3 other players in the hand with you terribly sucks. Your hand is 8-high, which means any card from the top half of the deck on the flop is going to put you in a precarious position post-flop of not knowing if you're ahead or behind unless you flop two pair or better, especially in a situation like this when the flop brings not only an overcard but a flush draw too.

If the whole purpose here is to isolate and wrap your arms around the LAP to your right and milk him, not only are there better spots to do so but additionally, inviting 2 other players into the party isn't going to help your cause.

Specifically for this hand, Hero flopped mid pair, worthless kicker. His hopes of winning this hand bank on either him not only improving on the turn but also dodging whatever draws are out there, hoping his outs are live, etc.

Your only real strength in this hand is hitting the flop super hard which begs the question, "Why not just play any 2 cards in position to begin with?"

Just one man's opinion -- I'm not claiming to be an expert.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:11 PM
DavidC DavidC is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: omfg
Posts: 9,677
Default Re: Hmm, let\'s call this a marginal 87o hand

Ok...

I raised, tag folded (*shrug* I guess he had 66?), the rest called. Turn was a brick I think, and it was checked to me and I bet, and I think everyone called again, but maybe only one player did. River was some card, and I checked it through.

I chopped it with my spewtard buddy, who also had 87o. Although it's kinda tough to say who played the hand better between myself, the tag, and the spewtard. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

I like raising the flop because it gets me to showdown cheaper than three calls, and hopefully gives me the option of taking a card on a dangerous card (A, trump, etc.), and I'm a little bit afraid that if I don't raise now, someone could potentially move me off the hand with a worse hand, or if I don't raise and bet the turn, someone might stick around with a hand that beats me that they could have maybe folded.

I don't know how likely any of those things are, though, and calling certainly has merit. If the tag bets again, I'm assuming that I fold? If the tag checks, and the passive bets, I fold, and if the maniac bets, I raise, right?
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:53 PM
TheHip41 TheHip41 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Every other month TAG
Posts: 5,237
Default Re: Hmm, let\'s call this a marginal 87o hand

do you really still suck at poker this much after three years?

wtf are you doing.

Fold PF, fold the flop. Next hand.

And no, raising the flop is bad. Even if you have the best hand, all 3 are calling the raise, and there are about 35 turn cards that will make your hand not good. And, you won't know which ones those are.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 03-29-2007, 06:56 PM
Genesis Genesis is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 805
Default Re: Hmm, let\'s call this a marginal 87o hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Your hand has no showdown value without pairing up.

[/ QUOTE ]

neither does his!

[/ QUOTE ]

That's irrelevant. If you both hold garbage the aggressor is going to win. If his style is to bet too much then you will fold and his garbage beats yours. Are you going to be bluff raising this 70/30/X guy? No, you'll be playing fit or fold and trying to 'outplay' him postflop. In reality when you both have garbage he is going to outplay you. It's all the other hands where you will try to make up the difference.

Regardless, after thinking about this hand some more I still don't agree with a preflop call. I don't think it's awful, but it's trying to push a very small edge against a player that we can find much better spots against.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 03-29-2007, 07:08 PM
TheHip41 TheHip41 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Every other month TAG
Posts: 5,237
Default Re: Hmm, let\'s call this a marginal 87o hand

i wanted to elaborate on PF

You have 87o. IF you raise, it's very likely the BB will call. The crazy will call.

You have 8 high, off suit.

The flop comes x x x, no 8 or 7 or gutshot.

How often is this guy

This guy's like 70/30/bluffspew

going to donk into you?

I'm guessing alot. If he donks a K53 board, good luck doing anything other than folding.

IF they both check, and you bet a K53 flop, what are the odds they both c/f? I'm guessing like less than 10%.

So now you have to bet the turn with 8 high vs a calling station and a maniac.

This hand is just awful, the fact you actually had the best hand isn't relavent.

If I'm the tag and I bet, I'll have Kx, a set, or a flush draw everytime. Good luck against my range with 8x.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 03-29-2007, 07:35 PM
TheWunderkind TheWunderkind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,492
Default Re: Hmm, let\'s call this a marginal 87o hand

preflop: just muck it, jba i guess you make more with KTo then 78o because: you can safely isoraise you will be often i a better spot if you hit a pair with KTo then 78o you will often win UI you can catch bluffs and semibluffs and you can make a lot more value bets. Compare it to 78o your only chance to win UI is to rebluff a spewtard wich is excessive spew until you have incredible reading skills, you will often loose to a higher pair,and you can make less valuebets the only better thing with 78o compared to Kto that its connectet but those few times you make the str8 does not outweight the losses imho +you have both blinds in. Im no mathematican and i have no proofs or stuff so its just guess. But if i would play it i woudl consider raising but the best is just to fold pf imho.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 03-29-2007, 07:38 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 9,596
Default Re: Hmm, let\'s call this a marginal 87o hand

[ QUOTE ]
preflop: just muck it, jba i guess you make more with KTo then 78o because: you can safely isoraise you will be often i a better spot if you hit a pair with KTo then 78o ...

[/ QUOTE ]

go back and read what I wrote again I dont think we're on the same page
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 03-29-2007, 07:51 PM
TheWunderkind TheWunderkind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,492
Default Re: Hmm, let\'s call this a marginal 87o hand

okay sry then you might be right, i dont and never really did playing with a preflop chart and i still think its a preflop fold and if you play it i would raise but not against this guy, the explaination is basiclly given im my previous post
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.