What do you hate about Poker Tracker?

[Mr Rick]

I have used PT for over a year and in general it serves me (for $55 I'll take it). However:

1) Users shouldn't have to set up individual DBs to segregate data. I.e., Because I want my 6-man game data viewed differently than my 10-man data I have set up discrete DB's for each. This is onerous and mistake prone - and forces me to play one or the other at one time. There are times I would like to view all of $5/$10 data at one time to gauge an opponents post flop aggression - and I can't do this. There should be 1 DB with ability to view data by any combination of game size, limit amount or NL, date range, etc. This also affects a prior discussion about efficiency. If there is to be 1 DB - it had better be fast.
Note that on my HP dual processor PC I am now avoiding the previous 10-15 second lockup I had been experiencing when importing data, auto-rating players, and playing at the same time.

2) The PT window for assessing the data on each player at a table could be improved. I understand there is another tool that overlays the data on the tables themselves - if this is automated so much the better. The data itself is incomplete. I consider post flop aggression data to be crucial. It should be summarized for each level (flop, turn, river, and total) and made visible.

3) Configuring the rating of players is limited to 14 icons (I believe). I could use at least 6 more that I would like to define. I'm sure somebody would make the argument for double the existing number...

[Small Fry]

[ QUOTE ]
I have used PT for over a year and in general it serves me (for $55 I'll take it). However:

1) Users shouldn't have to set up individual DBs to segregate data. I.e., Because I want my 6-man game data viewed differently than my 10-man data I have set up discrete DB's for each. This is onerous and mistake prone - and forces me to play one or the other at one time. There are times I would like to view all of $5/$10 data at one time to gauge an opponents post flop aggression - and I can't do this. There should be 1 DB with ability to view data by any combination of game size, limit amount or NL, date range, etc. This also affects a prior discussion about efficiency. If there is to be 1 DB - it had better be fast.
Note that on my HP dual processor PC I am now avoiding the previous 10-15 second lockup I had been experiencing when importing data, auto-rating players, and playing at the same time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Check out the preference tab

[rjp]

Thanks for all of the replies. This has (and will) take time to get right, so I want to make sure I do that. These posts will help.