$50 AQs flops a flush draw

[SABR42]

Also, I call cause I love to gamb00l obv.

[FireStorm]

Fold, this screams set, and you may have outs that are already dead to another flush draw.

[illini43]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is a very very close call in terms of EV. I would probably pass here and give up the tiny bit of EV you might have. If this was a tournament, I would probably call - but it isn't.

[/ QUOTE ]
This is backwards!

[/ QUOTE ]

After looking at this again, I disagree with my analysis of taking a slightly EV gamble in regards to cash and tournaments. In reality, you should call in either situation, tournament or cash, if you have a slightly +EV decision, even if it is high variance.

Obviously, tournaments have situations where making a razor thin +cEV (c = chip) call is incorrect given jumps in pay levels, etc. In cash games, you are throwing away $, even if only a few dollars each time you fold in a +EV spot.

Given the range of the likely set-holder, if you can remotely put a hand that isn't a set or a mega-combo draw (like AK) I think this is a call. However, that is truly opponent specific, so I really don't know what I would do here. Against a typical player I probably would call because I don't think a range of "set only + combo draw (FD+OESD)" is broad enough to cover some other holdings he might have.

I still hate this spot, but I think I would call after re-evaluating my flawed logic, even though it won't give you the best feeling in the world.

[wikemang]

Priced in = call. If this is +EV you should be calling. I didn't do the math, but there it is.