Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Full Ring
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 09-19-2007, 10:36 AM
Mike Kelley Mike Kelley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Reraising
Posts: 2,126
Default Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack

They really come in all shapes and sizes. The smart thing to do is start tight until you get a read and then adjust. I've seen 50/30's often.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-19-2007, 10:49 AM
RiverMustelid RiverMustelid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 291
Default Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack

Also look to the stack sizes - if they've let themselves slip to say $14 on a $100NL table and you've raised to $4, I will often call with undominated holdings like 76s. Its almost neutral EV and it makes them think you are a fish which you can exploit when you go back to normal ranges.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-19-2007, 10:53 AM
Sandviper23 Sandviper23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pokerstars
Posts: 417
Default Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack

[ QUOTE ]
Also look to the stack sizes - if they've let themselves slip to say $14 on a $100NL table and you've raised to $4, I will often call with undominated holdings like 76s. Its almost neutral EV and it makes them think you are a fish which you can exploit when you go back to normal ranges.

[/ QUOTE ]

I usually just pick an hour out of each week and play like a 60/2/0.5/ fish the best I can. Really messes with the other regulars [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:03 AM
Mike Kelley Mike Kelley is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Reraising
Posts: 2,126
Default Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack

I've been playing with the idea of starting my sessions like this for the first 2 or 3 rounds to mess with peoples poker trackers and get an image.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:23 AM
solvine solvine is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 201
Default Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack

i think with 5/4 ss, ithink AQ+ JJ+ is not so bad for calling down. I would probably applie the same to 16/8 maybe add in TT. The thing is, if someone who is SS has TT/99, and you raise to $4 is he really going to fold even though he is 5/4??
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:38 AM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack

[ QUOTE ]
Against a 5/4 SS, I think you can even argue about calling with AK and QQ.
Your second examples sound far too loose to me, I'd never ever call in such a spot with AT or 77. I think 99 or TT and AQs sounds better...

[/ QUOTE ]

um

16 to win 40 = 40% equity, so the 5/4SS would have to have a range of exactly AA/KK to be folding QQ pre

AA/KK = 0.9% pfr
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 09-19-2007, 11:49 AM
AlexB182 AlexB182 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,235
Default Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Against a 5/4 SS, I think you can even argue about calling with AK and QQ.
Your second examples sound far too loose to me, I'd never ever call in such a spot with AT or 77. I think 99 or TT and AQs sounds better...

[/ QUOTE ]


um

16 to win 40 = 40% equity, so the 5/4SS would have to have a range of exactly AA/KK to be folding QQ pre

AA/KK = 0.9% pfr

[/ QUOTE ]

Hm, ok. Convinced. What about AK, bottomset?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:01 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Against a 5/4 SS, I think you can even argue about calling with AK and QQ.
Your second examples sound far too loose to me, I'd never ever call in such a spot with AT or 77. I think 99 or TT and AQs sounds better...

[/ QUOTE ]


um

16 to win 40 = 40% equity, so the 5/4SS would have to have a range of exactly AA/KK to be folding QQ pre

AA/KK = 0.9% pfr

[/ QUOTE ]

Hm, ok. Convinced. What about AK, bottomset?

[/ QUOTE ]

well vs QQ+ AK(2.6% of hands) AKs and QQ are calls, AKo is very very tiny mistake to call

basically AKs = QQ > AKo
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:29 PM
Sandviper23 Sandviper23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Pokerstars
Posts: 417
Default Perfect Example

Villain is a clear 5.1/4.8/3 with 273 hands.

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $545.10
BB: $106.90
UTG: $49.00
UTG+1: $100.00
Sandviper23 (MP1): $205.35
MP2: $17.00
MP3: $62.55
CO: $35.80
BTN: $58.50

Preflop: Sandviper23 is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (9 Players)
2 folds, <font color="red">Sandviper23 raises to $4.00</font>, <font color="red">MP2 raises all-in to $17.00</font>, 5 folds, Sandviper23 calls $13.00

Flop: ($35.50) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

Turn: ($35.50) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

River: ($35.50) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

Pot Size: $35.50 ($35.50 Rake)

MP2 had A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (a pair of Aces) and LOST (-$17.00)
Sandviper23 had A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (a pair of Kings) and LOST (-$17.00)
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 09-19-2007, 12:33 PM
bottomset bottomset is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: middleset ftw
Posts: 12,983
Default Re: Perfect Example

[ QUOTE ]
Villain is a clear 5.1/4.8/3 with 273 hands.

Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter)

SB: $545.10
BB: $106.90
UTG: $49.00
UTG+1: $100.00
Sandviper23 (MP1): $205.35
MP2: $17.00
MP3: $62.55
CO: $35.80
BTN: $58.50

Preflop: Sandviper23 is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (9 Players)
2 folds, <font color="red">Sandviper23 raises to $4.00</font>, <font color="red">MP2 raises all-in to $17.00</font>, 5 folds, Sandviper23 calls $13.00

Flop: ($35.50) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

Turn: ($35.50) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

River: ($35.50) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In)

Pot Size: $35.50 ($35.50 Rake)

MP2 had A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (a pair of Aces) and LOST (-$17.00)
Sandviper23 had A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (a pair of Kings) and LOST (-$17.00)

[/ QUOTE ]

wait, you are telling me that AA is in his range when he RR's preflop

am I getting this right?

wow I think I learned something new today, I'm pumped, I'm going to just start folding KK everytime I get RR because well he could have AA and man that would suck

ps 273 hands doesn't tell you that much about VPIP and PFR, he could easily be running 4-5% below normal, also could easily have not had AA/KK/QQ in that sample either
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.