#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack
They really come in all shapes and sizes. The smart thing to do is start tight until you get a read and then adjust. I've seen 50/30's often.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack
Also look to the stack sizes - if they've let themselves slip to say $14 on a $100NL table and you've raised to $4, I will often call with undominated holdings like 76s. Its almost neutral EV and it makes them think you are a fish which you can exploit when you go back to normal ranges.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack
[ QUOTE ]
Also look to the stack sizes - if they've let themselves slip to say $14 on a $100NL table and you've raised to $4, I will often call with undominated holdings like 76s. Its almost neutral EV and it makes them think you are a fish which you can exploit when you go back to normal ranges. [/ QUOTE ] I usually just pick an hour out of each week and play like a 60/2/0.5/ fish the best I can. Really messes with the other regulars [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack
I've been playing with the idea of starting my sessions like this for the first 2 or 3 rounds to mess with peoples poker trackers and get an image.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack
i think with 5/4 ss, ithink AQ+ JJ+ is not so bad for calling down. I would probably applie the same to 16/8 maybe add in TT. The thing is, if someone who is SS has TT/99, and you raise to $4 is he really going to fold even though he is 5/4??
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack
[ QUOTE ]
Against a 5/4 SS, I think you can even argue about calling with AK and QQ. Your second examples sound far too loose to me, I'd never ever call in such a spot with AT or 77. I think 99 or TT and AQs sounds better... [/ QUOTE ] um 16 to win 40 = 40% equity, so the 5/4SS would have to have a range of exactly AA/KK to be folding QQ pre AA/KK = 0.9% pfr |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Against a 5/4 SS, I think you can even argue about calling with AK and QQ. Your second examples sound far too loose to me, I'd never ever call in such a spot with AT or 77. I think 99 or TT and AQs sounds better... [/ QUOTE ] um 16 to win 40 = 40% equity, so the 5/4SS would have to have a range of exactly AA/KK to be folding QQ pre AA/KK = 0.9% pfr [/ QUOTE ] Hm, ok. Convinced. What about AK, bottomset? |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Calling Range vs RR from ShortStack
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Against a 5/4 SS, I think you can even argue about calling with AK and QQ. Your second examples sound far too loose to me, I'd never ever call in such a spot with AT or 77. I think 99 or TT and AQs sounds better... [/ QUOTE ] um 16 to win 40 = 40% equity, so the 5/4SS would have to have a range of exactly AA/KK to be folding QQ pre AA/KK = 0.9% pfr [/ QUOTE ] Hm, ok. Convinced. What about AK, bottomset? [/ QUOTE ] well vs QQ+ AK(2.6% of hands) AKs and QQ are calls, AKo is very very tiny mistake to call basically AKs = QQ > AKo |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Perfect Example
Villain is a clear 5.1/4.8/3 with 273 hands.
Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter) SB: $545.10 BB: $106.90 UTG: $49.00 UTG+1: $100.00 Sandviper23 (MP1): $205.35 MP2: $17.00 MP3: $62.55 CO: $35.80 BTN: $58.50 Preflop: Sandviper23 is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (9 Players) 2 folds, <font color="red">Sandviper23 raises to $4.00</font>, <font color="red">MP2 raises all-in to $17.00</font>, 5 folds, Sandviper23 calls $13.00 Flop: ($35.50) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In) Turn: ($35.50) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In) River: ($35.50) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In) Pot Size: $35.50 ($35.50 Rake) MP2 had A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (a pair of Aces) and LOST (-$17.00) Sandviper23 had A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (a pair of Kings) and LOST (-$17.00) |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Perfect Example
[ QUOTE ]
Villain is a clear 5.1/4.8/3 with 273 hands. Poker Stars - No Limit Hold'em Cash Game - $0.50/$1 Blinds - 9 Players - (LegoPoker Hand History Converter) SB: $545.10 BB: $106.90 UTG: $49.00 UTG+1: $100.00 Sandviper23 (MP1): $205.35 MP2: $17.00 MP3: $62.55 CO: $35.80 BTN: $58.50 Preflop: Sandviper23 is dealt A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (9 Players) 2 folds, <font color="red">Sandviper23 raises to $4.00</font>, <font color="red">MP2 raises all-in to $17.00</font>, 5 folds, Sandviper23 calls $13.00 Flop: ($35.50) K[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In) Turn: ($35.50) 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In) River: ($35.50) 2[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] (2 Players - 1 All-In) Pot Size: $35.50 ($35.50 Rake) MP2 had A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] (a pair of Aces) and LOST (-$17.00) Sandviper23 had A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (a pair of Kings) and LOST (-$17.00) [/ QUOTE ] wait, you are telling me that AA is in his range when he RR's preflop am I getting this right? wow I think I learned something new today, I'm pumped, I'm going to just start folding KK everytime I get RR because well he could have AA and man that would suck ps 273 hands doesn't tell you that much about VPIP and PFR, he could easily be running 4-5% below normal, also could easily have not had AA/KK/QQ in that sample either |
|
|