Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-31-2007, 05:27 PM
DaCooler DaCooler is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Godmode Specialist
Posts: 1,725
Default Re: FT rakeback seems off.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Im sorry but doenst it seem like FT being dealt with twice at many hands at twice the limits should be more than this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Twice the hands (x2).. twice the limits (x2).. = 4x.

$238 x 4 = $952

You got $976. How does this not make sense?

Also, as you move up in stakes the difference between two levels becomes far less than doubling your rakeback because so many more hands hit the rake cap. It's actually a really good thing, you're paying less percentage of rake overall the higher you go.

[/ QUOTE ]

I guess i figured it would be more, what you say makes sense if they were both contributed yes, but when AP went from dealt to contributed i literally dropped from around 3k a month to 1k so im figuring Dealt at FT should at least be twice what im getting at ap
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-31-2007, 07:50 PM
morphd morphd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 418
Default Re: FT rakeback seems off.

Before AP went contributed their RB was wrong. They said it was dealt method but in actuality I was getting more 40% dealt using PT MGR method. That will account for FT seeming low also.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.