FT rakeback seems off.
 

Now i remember when AP was dealt and i would have $100 rakeback days easily multitabling 1/2 NL. Now does this make sense to you

This month, 9k hands at AP 1/2 NL for a 238$ RB payment

at FT 21K hands all at 2/4 NL for a 976$ RB payment

Im sorry but doenst it seem like FT being dealt with twice at many hands at twice the limits should be more than this?

Re: FT rakeback seems off.
 

Why not reconcile it with pokertracker?

Re: FT rakeback seems off.
 

Sounds about right to me. FT is tighter than AP preflop I believe. More 3 bet/folding results in fewer flops.

But yeah, reconciling with PT is a good idea, it's always pretty close for me.

Re: FT rakeback seems off.
 

i thought PT did contributed?

Re: FT rakeback seems off.
 

AP is contributed, FT is dealt, so yes, for tighter players, i would expect to see greater differences in RB...

keep in mind, poker tracker's numbers don't match up exactly with ur actual numbers, but i think it should be somewhat in the ballpark...

also, asking ur affiliate or the site for session histories might be a good idea...

Re: FT rakeback seems off.
 

Pokertracker matches up exactly in the Game Notes tab, not the General tab. Go to Session Notes, select the sessions, go to Game Notes and click Get All, and look at the MGR column. That will give you your 100% dealt rake paid, then figure your rakeback from there.

Re: FT rakeback seems off.
 

[ QUOTE ]

Pokertracker matches up exactly in the Game Notes tab, not the General tab. Go to Session Notes, select the sessions, go to Game Notes and click Get All, and look at the MGR column. That will give you your 100% dealt rake paid, then figure your rakeback from there.

[/ QUOTE ]

tried that and am getting all the hands to show up but the MGR column only says $560 which isnt even close

Re: FT rakeback seems off.
 

Did you do any of things this month which FTP deducts from your MGR?

Cleared a bonus, played in freerolls, made a deposit, bought something from the store... might be others too.

Re: FT rakeback seems off.
 

How does that seem off? You got paid a little more then 4 times your money playing two and 1/3 more hands. Considering some hands at 1-2 NL gets the same max cap rake as hands at 2-4 NL you don't accumulate more money. I would much rather go with FT's rb then AP rb.

Re: FT rakeback seems off.
 

[ QUOTE ]
Im sorry but doenst it seem like FT being dealt with twice at many hands at twice the limits should be more than this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Twice the hands (x2).. twice the limits (x2).. = 4x.

$238 x 4 = $952

You got $976. How does this not make sense?

Also, as you move up in stakes the difference between two levels becomes far less than doubling your rakeback because so many more hands hit the rake cap. It's actually a really good thing, you're paying less percentage of rake overall the higher you go.