#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($27) S/F Draw vs PattdownManiac
I had a better post that got killed by the IntarWeb, but I think you both played it bad.
I don't like the turn call by dale, or the river bet-call line by Pattdown. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($27) S/F Draw vs PattdownManiac
I think given that I have up to 15 outs (nearly 2/1) I only need to get around the same size bet from the villain on the river for the turn call not to be bad, I'm already getting 5/2 on the turn.
Even if the heart scares him and he checks the river surely he'll call a bet of around 200-300 with a strong hand that he obviously has. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($27) S/F Draw vs PattdownManiac
Your turn call was borderline and depends on a lot, but reads help, and you seemed to have them. Lead-call on his part is just not good, but I make far worse decisions every day and it seems to work out OK. Meh, I'm torn...I don't have a whole lot of hands early against regs.
BTW, never ever post the AA vs. set hand from a couple of days ago where I knew you had a set but gifted you my stack anyway. |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($27) S/F Draw vs PattdownManiac
[ QUOTE ]
BTW, never ever post the AA vs. set hand from a couple of days ago where I knew you had a set but gifted you my stack anyway. [/ QUOTE ] Implied odds FTW! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ($27) S/F Draw vs PattdownManiac
IMO you should stay at 27s because they are more baller than 16s.
|
|
|