Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-08-2007, 03:56 PM
Thriller Thriller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 146
Default Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk

[ QUOTE ]
pf is fine, standard.
flop is fine, standard.
with top two in 6m (which is aggressive by its nature) a fold here is beyond awful and a call is almost as bad. 100% raise please.

[/ QUOTE ]

fair enough, but why is it awful?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-08-2007, 03:59 PM
BigBadBabar BigBadBabar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: working on my 5k post yo
Posts: 5,000
Default Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk

thriller, i take it you're new to poker, but top two pair is a strong hand that should go to showdown with lots of betting and raising so the opponent's money gets in the pot and goes to us at that showdown.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:06 PM
Thriller Thriller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 146
Default Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk

I'm not new to poker, per se, but I'm new to *thinking* about poker. I've either been insanely lucky over the past few years or I am doing some things naturally right and a lot of things naturally wrong. I deposited 50$ once several years ago and worked it up to about 1200.00, including a couple of small MTT wins. I took most of it out to pay for a skiing trip. This doesn't mean I think I'm good, I was probably very lucky. I came back to find I had <10 and it was time to start building it back up. And, I'm simply ready to learn.

End of PSA - on to the hand in question.

I'm cool with the idea of top two pair going to showdown - that's fine. At the same time, am I supposed to ignore the reason he is betting on the turn in the first place? Am I giving him too much credit for his pre-flop raise and then waiting for the turn to lead out?

The way I see it, we are losing to TT, JJ, KQs and KQo. All of those hands are hands that I can see being raised (and calling a 3-bet) preflop.

I'm not sure how else to interpret the turn bet from the villain.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:10 PM
bravos1 bravos1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: looking for the bigger nits
Posts: 7,905
Default Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk

[ QUOTE ]
I'm not new to poker, per se, but I'm new to *thinking* about poker. I've either been insanely lucky over the past few years or I am doing some things naturally right and a lot of things naturally wrong. I deposited 50$ once several years ago and worked it up to about 1200.00, including a couple of small MTT wins. I took most of it out to pay for a skiing trip. This doesn't mean I think I'm good, I was probably very lucky. I came back to find I had <10 and it was time to start building it back up. And, I'm simply ready to learn.

End of PSA - on to the hand in question.

I'm cool with the idea of top two pair going to showdown - that's fine. At the same time, am I supposed to ignore the reason he is betting on the turn in the first place? Am I giving him too much credit for his pre-flop raise and then waiting for the turn to lead out?

The way I see it, we are losing to TT, JJ, KQs and KQo. All of those hands are hands that I can see being raised (and calling a 3-bet) preflop.

I'm not sure how else to interpret the turn bet from the villain.

[/ QUOTE ]

I believe villan has A2 before thinking he has these hands. Why would he play in a way to basically ensure the least amount goes into the pot 80% of the time.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:13 PM
NIX NIX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: It\'s Sabotage
Posts: 1,762
Default Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk

[ QUOTE ]
I'm cool with the idea of top two pair going to showdown - that's fine. At the same time, am I supposed to ignore the reason he is betting on the turn in the first place? Am I giving him too much credit for his pre-flop raise and then waiting for the turn to lead out?

[/ QUOTE ]
I ask this to you as well BBB. What range are you putting CO on after his donk?
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:13 PM
BigBadBabar BigBadBabar is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: working on my 5k post yo
Posts: 5,000
Default Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk

a strong hand, with all the strength we're showing, could checkraise us at any time to get more money into the pot.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:18 PM
Thriller Thriller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 146
Default Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not new to poker, per se, but I'm new to *thinking* about poker. I've either been insanely lucky over the past few years or I am doing some things naturally right and a lot of things naturally wrong. I deposited 50$ once several years ago and worked it up to about 1200.00, including a couple of small MTT wins. I took most of it out to pay for a skiing trip. This doesn't mean I think I'm good, I was probably very lucky. I came back to find I had <10 and it was time to start building it back up. And, I'm simply ready to learn.

End of PSA - on to the hand in question.

I'm cool with the idea of top two pair going to showdown - that's fine. At the same time, am I supposed to ignore the reason he is betting on the turn in the first place? Am I giving him too much credit for his pre-flop raise and then waiting for the turn to lead out?

The way I see it, we are losing to TT, JJ, KQs and KQo. All of those hands are hands that I can see being raised (and calling a 3-bet) preflop.

I'm not sure how else to interpret the turn bet from the villain.

[/ QUOTE ]

I believe villan has A2 before thinking he has these hands. Why would he play in a way to basically ensure the least amount goes into the pot 80% of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

Then I am completely out my element. I didn't give a single thought to A2 calling a 3bet pre-flop. That just doesn't make any sense to me. Why would he more likely to have A2?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:23 PM
NIX NIX is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: It\'s Sabotage
Posts: 1,762
Default Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk

[ QUOTE ]
Then I am completely out my element. I didn't give a single thought to A2 calling a 3bet pre-flop. That just doesn't make any sense to me. Why would he more likely to have A2?

[/ QUOTE ]
For any limit poker, if you put in x amount of bets preflop and someone raises so you have to call one more, call that bet. No doing so is really bad. In this case, if CO did raise with A2 preflop, it'd be horrible if he folds getting 9:1 closing the action.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:26 PM
bozlax bozlax is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Wookie is right
Posts: 8,848
Default Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk

[ QUOTE ]
The way I see it, we are losing to TT, JJ, KQs and KQo. All of those hands are hands that I can see being raised (and calling a 3-bet) preflop.

I'm not sure how else to interpret the turn bet from the villain.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thrill, it's good that you're trying to do this, but you're making a common mistake: the range is too tight, and only includes hands that beat you. What about AT? What about AK? What about A2? What about JT?
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-08-2007, 04:27 PM
Thriller Thriller is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 146
Default Re: My two pair vs. a TAG\'s turn donk

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Then I am completely out my element. I didn't give a single thought to A2 calling a 3bet pre-flop. That just doesn't make any sense to me. Why would he more likely to have A2?

[/ QUOTE ]
For any limit poker, if you put in x amount of bets preflop and someone raises so you have to call one more, call that bet. No doing so is really bad. In this case, if CO did raise with A2 preflop, it'd be horrible if he folds getting 9:1 closing the action.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agreed and understood. So I guess we are looking at him making his own 2 pair when the 2 hits?

I am beyond confused. I'm evidently missing some very important concepts that are second nature to most people, even at these limits. I'm starting to see that I'm lucky to have profitable to this (admittedly very small sample) point.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.