#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] PS = FT ... if you want soft hit Bodog or Prima [/ QUOTE ] is bodog compatible with pt and pahud? [/ QUOTE ] No...that's why it's soft |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
dam don't say FT is a rock garden that's depressing to me
ignorance is blisssssssssssssss |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
What defines a rock garden?
Personally I think its quite easy to find good tables at FT, especially since you can datamine before you sit down. Yesterday I was sitting at 4 NL100 tables averaging 45%/5%.... Is that a rock garden? I generally play later evenings and early nights eastern time... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
[ QUOTE ]
What defines a rock garden? [/ QUOTE ] 1. playing a 6max game with 4 other known 2+2 posters that have green names 2. Seeing VPIP and PFR in red and same number on entire table. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
[ QUOTE ]
green names [/ QUOTE ] ??? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
[ QUOTE ]
haha WackoJacko! [/ QUOTE ] |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
That's pretty good man. Nice scouting.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] green names [/ QUOTE ] ??? [/ QUOTE ] He uses the free alternative of PAH, GameTime++, which shows profitable names in green, I think. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
If one wants tight and tough games there's WPEX, no rake, no point playing at full tilt (it's also a rather fitting name to what happens there). PokerStars may be rigged according to this: http://poker-sucks.com/poker-sucks/p...bbing-you.html though not reliable.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: POKERSTARS VS. FULL TILT, WHICH SITE IS SOFTER?
[ QUOTE ]
just have 12 accounts at each [/ QUOTE ] just 12 each nh |
|
|