The Limp Reraise Quantified + my SSNL Introduction

[ValarMorghulis]

I decided to try and make the list more easily digestible to see if it offered any more conclusions. (Hopefully got the addition right.)

AA: 11.6%
KK-JJ: 21.1%
AK: 7.9%
AQ-AT\KQ: 14.7%
TT-22: 17.7%
Other: 27%

So based on this you could maybe put a lrr's range as AT+/22+

And here was me putting them all on AA!!

[prayformojo]

I would love to see a comparison between stacks that are <50BB and stacks that are >50BB, both to compare the quality of hands that short stacks L/RR and to examine whether short stacks L/RR with greater frequency. With your numbers, though, that study may be stretching your sample size a bit too thin.

[Spy Dog]

Nice post rvg72. I'd love more posts like this.

[rvg72]

[ QUOTE ]
I decided to try and make the list more easily digestible to see if it offered any more conclusions. (Hopefully got the addition right.)

AA: 11.6%
KK-JJ: 21.1%
AK: 7.9%
AQ-AT\KQ: 14.7%
TT-22: 17.7%
Other: 27%

So based on this you could maybe put a lrr's range as AT+/22+

And here was me putting them all on AA!!

[/ QUOTE ]

I'll make a more complete post on this in a few hours when I'm at work but one thing you should note is that a higher percentage of "Won Postflop" hands would be premium hands. The "Won Preflop" should be pretty much the same breakdown as shown hands etc. Not knowing all of the results can skew the data quite a bit but I'll make an attempt at estimating the real numbers.

rvg

[rvg72]

[ QUOTE ]
I would love to see a comparison between stacks that are <50BB and stacks that are >50BB, both to compare the quality of hands that short stacks L/RR and to examine whether short stacks L/RR with greater frequency. With your numbers, though, that study may be stretching your sample size a bit too thin.

[/ QUOTE ]

Here it is for <= 50BB

<font class="small">Code:</font><hr /><pre>

Won Preflop 109
Won Postflop 64
Folded Postflop 16
Folded Preflop 3

AA 36 6.7%
KK 34 6.4%
QQ 34 6.4%
AK 24 4.5%
AJ 19 3.6%
99 18 3.4%
JJ 18 3.4%
77 15 2.8%
AKs 15 2.8%
44 14 2.6%
AT 14 2.6%
AQ 12 2.2%
TT 12 2.2%
66 11 2.1%
88 11 2.1%
33 10 1.9%
KQ 10 1.9%
55 9 1.7%
A4s 9 1.7%
KT 9 1.7%
A6 8 1.5%
AJs 8 1.5%
Q9s 8 1.5%
KJ 7 1.3%
QJ 7 1.3%
A8 6 1.1%
A9 6 1.1%
A9s 6 1.1%
A3 5 0.9%
A8s 5 0.9%
K9 5 0.9%
T9 5 0.9%
A3s 4 0.7%
A7 4 0.7%
A7s 4 0.7%
AQs 4 0.7%
QJs 4 0.7%
T8s 4 0.7%
98 3 0.6%
65s 3 0.6%
A2s 3 0.6%
A4 3 0.6%
A5 3 0.6%
ATs 3 0.6%
K2s 3 0.6%
K7s 3 0.6%
K8 3 0.6%
KJs 3 0.6%
KQs 3 0.6%
76s 2 0.4%
98s 2 0.4%
A5s 2 0.4%
J3s 2 0.4%
J9 2 0.4%
J9s 2 0.4%
JT 2 0.4%
JTs 2 0.4%
K8s 2 0.4%
K9s 2 0.4%
KTs 2 0.4%
Q6s 2 0.4%
QT 2 0.4%
QTs 2 0.4%
T8 2 0.4%
T9s 2 0.4%
53 1 0.2%
65 1 0.2%
75 1 0.2%
76 1 0.2%
84 1 0.2%
87 1 0.2%
96 1 0.2%
97 1 0.2%
32s 1 0.2%
52s 1 0.2%
54s 1 0.2%
63s 1 0.2%
64s 1 0.2%
72s 1 0.2%
74s 1 0.2%
83s 1 0.2%
84s 1 0.2%
85s 1 0.2%
87s 1 0.2%
97s 1 0.2%
A2 1 0.2%
A6s 1 0.2%
J3 1 0.2%
J4 1 0.2%
J8 1 0.2%
K4 1 0.2%
K5s 1 0.2%
K6s 1 0.2%
Q3s 1 0.2%
Q5s 1 0.2%
Q7 1 0.2%
Q7s 1 0.2%
Q8s 1 0.2%
T5s 1 0.2%
T6s 1 0.2%

</pre><hr />

rvg

[Grunch]

I did something similar last week...

[BalugaWhale]

i would love to know the average stack size.

[rvg72]

[ QUOTE ]
I did something similar last week...

[/ QUOTE ]

That's funny, I totally copied you! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] I actually missed that post. It seems as though the results are fairly consistent which is good.

rvg

[rvg72]

[ QUOTE ]
i would love to know the average stack size.

[/ QUOTE ]

I have another 300K hands or so sitting in zip files that I'll run through and I'll break it down by 0-25 BB, 25-50BB, 50-100BB and 100+

rvg

[goofyballer]

If this isn't too much trouble, I would be interested to know how the numbers differ if you filter for only limp-min-re-raises.