($60 turbo) yuck

[ciaran]

[ QUOTE ]
I'd call. Any player that limps behind another player here with a big pair is an idiot so his range is definitely big.

[/ QUOTE ]

Over-limp-re-raising is apparently the new thing, which is to say that at the 16s these guys have been having AA a lot recently (and I've seen AA get to showdown as an over-limp where there was no raise behind quite a bit as well).

I don't have a lot of experience at the 60s, but whatever. Without some read on the villain to sway things, and assuming my limited experience with the 60s being almost as donktastic as the 16s/27s early is correct, this is probably pretty close (donks balancing out the "tricky" AAs).

[AMT]

i dont think your stats should mean anything after 5 hands, and calling here is fine most of the time readless IMO

[ryanghall]

I'd call for sure.

Ryan

[FoldYourLife]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'd call. Any player that limps behind another player here with a big pair is an idiot so his range is definitely big.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

[Eagles]

Call

[octaveshift]

I don't have the discipline to fold here, nor am I sure it's even the right thing to do.

Without a read, I think you've got to call. You've got the 4th best starting hand. Callllllllllllll.

[wuwei]

Stats very very little, of course. I call quickly.