Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-15-2006, 05:21 PM
Jouster777 Jouster777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAG right, nit left
Posts: 1,825
Default Re: LP raising standards

I can't get myself to raise a SC with multiple limpers because I can't understand why the benefits of a raise outweigh the benefit of having a multiway pot with these hands. Can someone address this?
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-15-2006, 05:30 PM
Slap My Jack Slap My Jack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,817
Default Re: LP raising standards

Agree with dbitel.

Just that when you start playing this way you have to be prepared for the variance it introduces.

You're also going to making tougher decisions postflop.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-15-2006, 05:31 PM
ticks ticks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In the Red
Posts: 2,076
Default Re: LP raising standards

I just want to add that any preflop strategy should be extremely flexible, always adapting to shifting circumstances.

Things you should always consider at the table before you play a hand:
1) How deep are we?
2) How loose are the limpers ahead of you?
3) How loose are the people left to act?
4) How loose are they postflop?
5) How has the action been lately? Have you been quiet or active?
6) Are your opponents good or bad?
7) Other stuff that I cant think of right now

These are the kind of things that should dictate your preflop play,
not a starting hand chart.

Example hand
A4o is valuable when:
You are first in.
Players behind you are tight.
A4o is not valuable when:
You have limpers ahead of you.
Players behind you are loose.

Etc.

Bonus link: Pokey's post on blind stealing
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-15-2006, 05:35 PM
ticks ticks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: In the Red
Posts: 2,076
Default Re: LP raising standards

[ QUOTE ]
I can't get myself to raise a SC with multiple limpers because I can't understand why the benefits of a raise outweigh the benefit of having a multiway pot with these hands. Can someone address this?

[/ QUOTE ]

Two main reasons:
- Deception
- My c-bets are an important source of income

However, you cant say always do this or that with sc.
It all depends on the specific table dynamics.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-15-2006, 05:42 PM
Johan L Johan L is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: NL100$ FR 15/5/2.5
Posts: 489
Default Re: LP raising standards

Everytime I play aggro I looose!
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-15-2006, 05:45 PM
Dan Bitel Dan Bitel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bork! Bork! Bork!
Posts: 11,164
Default Re: LP raising standards

Jouster777,

I've come to the conclusion that limping sucks
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-15-2006, 06:04 PM
Jouster777 Jouster777 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: LAG right, nit left
Posts: 1,825
Default Re: LP raising standards

[ QUOTE ]
Two main reasons:
- Deception
- My c-bets are an important source of income

However, you cant say always do this or that with sc.
It all depends on the specific table dynamics.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is how I convince myself to raise them with 0-1 limpers but these hands are pretty nice to get multiway. I'm trying to weigh the relative benefits...as you say it may be my specific table dynamics - see below.


[ QUOTE ]
Jouster777, I've come to the conclusion that limping sucks

[/ QUOTE ]
I still do it, a lot...Party 25NL & 50NL has so many tables with loose-passive preflop players that I can't pass it up. It may be a matter or the level or it may just be me needing more education.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-15-2006, 07:08 PM
Dan Bitel Dan Bitel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bork! Bork! Bork!
Posts: 11,164
Default Re: LP raising standards

Jouster777,

the wiered thing is that in theory, it seems that we should limp hands like 67s in multiway pots. But in practice, I find that raising is just more +EV. I think the reason is that opponents rarely get 2nd best hands when we flop good with these kind of hands, and picking up the dead money in the pot preflop and cbetting the flop if they call is just soooooo +EV
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-15-2006, 07:49 PM
Isura Isura is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 13,926
Default Re: LP raising standards

[ QUOTE ]
Jouster777,

I've come to the conclusion that limping sucks

[/ QUOTE ]

I tend to agree.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-15-2006, 09:10 PM
Dan Bitel Dan Bitel is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Bork! Bork! Bork!
Posts: 11,164
Default Re: LP raising standards

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Jouster777,

I've come to the conclusion that limping sucks

[/ QUOTE ]

I tend to agree.

[/ QUOTE ]

your experiment with limping didnt go great then?
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.