Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro Stakes Limit
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 05-22-2006, 12:23 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 8,076
Default Re: Top pair in a small pot

[ QUOTE ]
I don't know why everyone wants to call the flop; because you got 3bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

In a small pot, Hero makes money by inducing postflop errors, not protecting his share of the pot.
--> Villain left to act is likely to make an error by peeling
--> When hero is behind, he's making a substantial error by raising
--> When hero is ahead, villain is less inclined to call down with a weak hand
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-22-2006, 12:29 PM
MacGuyV MacGuyV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: old school
Posts: 10,100
Default Re: Top pair in a small pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know why everyone wants to call the flop; because you got 3bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

In a small pot, Hero makes money by inducing postflop errors, not protecting his share of the pot.
--> Villain left to act is likely to make an error by peeling
--> When hero is behind, he's making a substantial error by raising
--> When hero is ahead, villain is less inclined to call down with a weak hand

[/ QUOTE ]
I think we can induce MP1 to make larger errors by raising. The beauty of this game is that he will call 2 cold with A7/K7/A3/J9/J8 all day. Furthermore if MP1 overcalls, BB will frequently check draws on the turn. Furthermore we're rarely outkicked given BB's 14 PFR.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-22-2006, 01:35 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 8,076
Default Re: Top pair in a small pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know why everyone wants to call the flop; because you got 3bet?

[/ QUOTE ]

In a small pot, Hero makes money by inducing postflop errors, not protecting his share of the pot.
--> Villain left to act is likely to make an error by peeling
--> When hero is behind, he's making a substantial error by raising
--> When hero is ahead, villain is less inclined to call down with a weak hand

[/ QUOTE ]
I think we can induce MP1 to make larger errors by raising. The beauty of this game is that he will call 2 cold with A7/K7/A3/J9/J8 all day. Furthermore if MP1 overcalls, BB will frequently check draws on the turn. Furthermore we're rarely outkicked given BB's 14 PFR.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that's an optimisitic assessment of MP1 because it's a small pot, but it's hard to aruge this in concrete terms. I suspect that the liklihood of him holding a coldcalling hand is small relative to the number of peeling hands that he has (peeling hands may include two cards higher than the second highest rank on the board or hands containing a lone high heart, but coldcalling hands almost certainly will not).

I can say that your assessment of BB is probably wrong. I have a PFR that hovers around 12, and I'm often checking KT, QT in the big blind. AT will sometimes get checked depending on the table conditions. You can unequivically say that you're rarely outkicked because there are more Tx hands that are worse than JT than better.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-22-2006, 01:39 PM
MacGuyV MacGuyV is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: old school
Posts: 10,100
Default Re: Top pair in a small pot

[ QUOTE ]
[I can say that your assessment of BB is probably wrong. I have a PFR that hovers around 12, and I'm often checking KT, QT in the big blind. AT will sometimes get checked depending on the table conditions. You can unequivically say that you're rarely outkicked because there are more Tx hands that are worse than JT than better.


[/ QUOTE ]

Fair enough - I was going to edit that because I worded it wrong and because I knew you were going to be a nit about it; but the point is we have the best hand very very often.

I don't think my assumption of MP1 is terribly optimistic unless the 5/10 game is softer than 1/2.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-22-2006, 01:59 PM
paiz paiz is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: seeking to achieve busto
Posts: 224
Default Re: Top pair in a small pot

grunch

I think you call the 3-bet and go into WA/WB mode.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 05-22-2006, 02:19 PM
Xhad Xhad is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: .25/.50 6max - stars
Posts: 5,289
Default Re: Top pair in a small pot

With 3 overcards that beat us, a flush draw, and five cards that make us top 2 pair or better this is not WA/WB.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 05-22-2006, 03:09 PM
rjacobs003 rjacobs003 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Cape Town
Posts: 469
Default Re: Top pair in a small pot

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'd be very interested in the responses here as the big blind after a pre-flop limp is a big unknown quantity - which is probably why I try to go as aggressive as possible pre-flop to weed 'em out [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

That's a dangerous preflop mentality.

[/ QUOTE ]


Agreed and its something I'm working on although I do tend to lapse now and then. Tightening up my starting selection has really helped with this as in a lot of cases I can now AFFORD to be aggressive as I'm starting with good hands.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 05-22-2006, 07:53 PM
Stoo_Pot Stoo_Pot is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: United Kingdom of lost liberty
Posts: 484
Default Re: Top pair in a small pot

Interesting arguments for both raising and calling. We don't need to raise to protect our hand because mp1 would be making a mistake by calling with overs or a lower pair.
I usually raise this in the heat of things but I like the argument for raising a safe turn. Are we taking a free showdown if offered?
Would you raise the flop in a large pot Aaron because folding mp1 will have a larger equity gain in terms of BB and also fold equity?
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 05-22-2006, 07:58 PM
Buckmulligan Buckmulligan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: easy like a sunday morning
Posts: 4,496
Default Re: Top pair in a small pot

ya, i raise this flop.

Aaron pointed out that since the pot is small we can screw around. I agree with McGahee though. OUr raising does not really force villain to make correct choices;.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 05-22-2006, 08:27 PM
Aaron W. Aaron W. is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Henderson, NV
Posts: 8,076
Default Re: Top pair in a small pot

[ QUOTE ]
I usually raise this in the heat of things but I like the argument for raising a safe turn. Are we taking a free showdown if offered?

[/ QUOTE ]

Usually not. If he's checking to us on the river, we usually have the best hand.

[ QUOTE ]
Would you raise the flop in a large pot Aaron because folding mp1 will have a larger equity gain in terms of BB and also fold equity?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. In that case, folding out villain behind us earns us more money than him making a bad call.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.