![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
so push then. c [/ QUOTE ] Is that advice, or harassment? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think this is an easy push. SB isn't calling enough here imo. You're also going to be ahead of BB's range too. No way I pass this up with blinds at 250/500.
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] so push then. c [/ QUOTE ] Is that advice, or harassment? [/ QUOTE ] it's advice based solely on the title of my post and my knowledge of your style from other read posts. c |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
scuba,
citanul's point is mainly that if you think it's +$EV then you should push. That's what it's all about, right? Profit bitch! Yugoslav Who would push fwiw. unless BB had shown maniacal calling standards. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think I'd fold this most of the time, depending on reads which isn't saying much. There is a lot I could say which is not worth typing out about getting ITM, then getting HU, but I just think you are in a position to get HU and in the meantime take advantage of picking up some chips when you have a clear advantage.
ICM ITM is not nearly the same as ICM on the bubble. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
What about just calling and playing some postflop poker? Is that out of the question?
-$$ |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Uh, no, lookit the blinds.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
what do you use SNGPT for if not to play and push when it is $EV? If its plus $EV, its plus $EV. shoveit.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
ICM ITM is not nearly the same as ICM on the bubble. [/ QUOTE ] It should be. Calling standards are different tho. |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I will get back to you on this...
But if you look at some of your ITM hands on SNGPT and what is +EV I think you'll feel differently. |
![]() |
|
|