Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > STT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:11 PM
Luisgallo Luisgallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in route to supernova...
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: (39) KQ, good spot to \'action limp\'?

[ QUOTE ]
SB should raise you all in pretty much 100% if you ever put money in this pot without going all in. I do not like a raise, I do not like a limp here.

This is a push/fold situation

[/ QUOTE ]

How simple is that??
The reason why the dude did not get many answers is beacause this is very very standard!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:14 PM
Luisgallo Luisgallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in route to supernova...
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: (39) KQ, good spot to \'action limp\'?

is this a joke right?
You miniraise and fold to a reraise? what do u expect big stack in position is going to fold your miniraise???

you wanto to miniraise AA or KK...here it is a 100% fold.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:14 PM
Sparta45 Sparta45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dominating short handed tables
Posts: 2,211
Default Re: (39) KQ, good spot to \'action limp\'?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
SB should raise you all in pretty much 100% if you ever put money in this pot without going all in. I do not like a raise, I do not like a limp here.

This is a push/fold situation

[/ QUOTE ]

How simple is that??
The reason why the dude did not get many answers is beacause this is very very standard!

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think that's why. I think he didn't get answers because this hand is not standard.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:17 PM
Luisgallo Luisgallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in route to supernova...
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: (39) KQ, good spot to \'action limp\'?

Tell me why this is not standard.
Tell me why is ever correct limping or raising a big stack on the bubble with a marginal hand whent here is a 3BB shortie.

If you can explain me those things then the hand will be non standard.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:21 PM
JSH06 JSH06 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Winona, MN
Posts: 1,983
Default Re: (39) KQ, good spot to \'action limp\'?

I think folding & calling are both fine. If you call you have a hand that's far above average to hopefully take against the small stack. If you fold the SB will probably often shove and BB will usually call since he has 3BBs and would be getting almost 2:1. I think a raise of any sort is just asking to get pwned by the big stack.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:22 PM
kylephilly kylephilly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: illadelph
Posts: 2,019
Default Re: (39) KQ, good spot to \'action limp\'?

Calling is not the right play in my opinion
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:23 PM
Luisgallo Luisgallo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: in route to supernova...
Posts: 1,307
Default Re: (39) KQ, good spot to \'action limp\'?

If you call and SB will shove anyway.

calling is just a huge waste of chips.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:24 PM
Sparta45 Sparta45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Dominating short handed tables
Posts: 2,211
Default Re: (39) KQ, good spot to \'action limp\'?

[ QUOTE ]
Tell me why this is not standard.
Tell me why is ever correct limping or raising a big stack on the bubble with a marginal hand whent here is a 3BB shortie.

If you can explain me those things then the hand will be non standard.

[/ QUOTE ]

I already did above, but there are 2 main scenarios

1) SB folds to BB and BB increases his stack by 25% at no risk

2) SB pushes his marginal hand into BB and BB calls because he's short stacked and doubles up. Now BB has 1200 chip and we have 1800 because we refused to enter the pot with a KQ (which is a pretty nice hand for a 3 handed game).

If hero doesn't enter the pot, he not only loses the value of his KQ, but he increases the odds the shorty comes back and hurts him. Folding pf is a mistake.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:26 PM
kylephilly kylephilly is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: illadelph
Posts: 2,019
Default Re: (39) KQ, good spot to \'action limp\'?

I believe the right play is a 3x BB raise and adjust to a push based off of previous reads
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 03-15-2007, 01:26 PM
JSH06 JSH06 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Winona, MN
Posts: 1,983
Default Re: (39) KQ, good spot to \'action limp\'?

[ QUOTE ]
I dont know if I like the fold.

I think you may have the best hand, obviously you can wait for the BB to get blinded out, but if he happens to double through you may now have more pressure to play poker and this might be your best shot.

I guess I fold here with this line but I think I raise this hand on the button 90% of the time in this situation.

What do we know about the SB?

You could raise to 600 and fold and still have 2x the BB if you think he really has it

[/ QUOTE ]

Lol n00baments
Raising to 600 is absolutely awful. It's 1/3 of our stack and is asking to get pwned by the big stack. If you really wanted to raise a min raise is 2463457438243 times better. I mean what is a 600 raise going to accomplish that a min raise doesn't? Is the short stack going to stop n go to a min raise and make you fold on the flop? I sure as hell hope not.

Calling after the shove is atrocius. We have 3x the amount of chips as the short stack. Even if we were 100% certain the big stack is pushing any 2 cards here it would still be massively -EV to call.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.