#121
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] it is not meant to be part of the game. [/ QUOTE ] Texas Hold'em by TWP: 1: Everyone must sit with 100BB or more (guys I dont know how to play with less, k?) 2: NO CHECKRAISING (Its mean!) 3: Must have Power Ranger Avatar! [/ QUOTE ] Is there something wrong with this? edit: also, have I ever said a word to your stupid ass at the tables? no. |
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
I mentioned this before but nobody answered. It seems most stars 25/50 games are full ring. Wouldn't adding more 6max games help.
|
#123
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] it is not meant to be part of the game. [/ QUOTE ] Texas Hold'em by TWP: 1: Everyone must sit with 100BB or more (guys I dont know how to play with less, k?) 2: NO CHECKRAISING (Its mean!) 3: Must have Power Ranger Avatar! [/ QUOTE ] Is there something wrong with this? edit: also, have I ever said a word to your stupid ass at the tables? no. [/ QUOTE ] Why does you saying anything to me at the tables have anything to do with it? When did ANYONE decide NL cash games were 100BB games? |
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
when god gave holdem to moses. and i was just pointing out that even though you're a retarded short stacking monkey, i dont harass you at the tables. i only talk about it in a thread on the topic. so if you dont want to discuss the topic, you could just ignore the thread. its not like i tried to impose my views on you. i just expressed them in a thread for that purpose.
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
Im replying in this thread because I disagree. Should I just go brood in the corner and pout because people are angry at me?
|
#126
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
Oh, I misread your post as
[ QUOTE ] Texas Hold'em by TWP: 1: Everyone must sit with 100BB or more (guys I dont know how to play with less, k?) 2: NO CHECKRAISING (Its mean!) 3: Must have Power Ranger Avatar! [/ QUOTE ] Didn't realise it said [ QUOTE ] I disagree [/ QUOTE ] |
#127
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
Going all in preflop 75% of your plays and then leaving the table and then coming back with the minimum is no way the way poker is and was intented to be.
Never seeing a turn or river for hours is not the way poker was intented to be. Think about it. |
#128
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
who are all the people posting in this thread that i have never seen in hsnl before? is there a short stacking newsletter or something?
|
#129
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
Never seeing a turn or river for hours is not the way poker was intented to be. [/ QUOTE ] You get to see those when all-in. |
#130
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Would a shorstack boycott on PS work?
[ QUOTE ]
I mentioned this before but nobody answered. It seems most stars 25/50 games are full ring. Wouldn't adding more 6max games help. [/ QUOTE ] three players at the table is the signal for any short stacks to sit. |
|
|