![]() |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
6 Tables of 3/6 6max.
2.1XBB/100 over 25k hands |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
2.3 BB/100 80K hands this year 4-tabling .5/1 through 2/4, majority at 1/2. I thought this was crappy I'm glad people have similar numbers
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone running over 4 tables at a time and keeping a high BB/100? [/ QUOTE ] Well, it appears as if people are giving you 25k hand samples. If you want a better number then the ones I previouly gave, I am running at 4 BB/100 with 4-5 tables at 5/10 6max over my last 25k. These numbers don't mean much. The norm is somewhere between 1.5 and 2.0 BB/100 for both full ring and 6 max. Most people are able to stay within this range when they multitable but they do begin to drop towards the lower end as they add tables. If you are a newer player, anything over .01 BB/100 is good [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I do believe Schneids was able to 8-table the 10/20 6max for 2 BB/100.
Scott PS That was without any sort of HUD. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
i cant beat 6max so 0 BB/100 3 tabling
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am 14.89BB/100 4 tabling 2/4 at pokerroom the last 2000 hands. I'm pretty confident these numbers will hold.
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I am 14.89BB/100 4 tabling 2/4 at pokerroom the last 2000 hands. I'm pretty confident these numbers will hold. [/ QUOTE ] good joke |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Loc: '06 NL east champs"
good joke |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wouldn't say it's a lock, but it's the best chance a team has had since the Braves started their run...
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I say 4-tabling with 2bb/100 is gooooodddd
|
![]() |
|
|