|
|
#11
03-27-2006, 02:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Value-bet straight on 2-pair board?
[ QUOTE ]
I think bet calling is a better line. [/ QUOTE ] what are we beating when we get c/r here? a total bluff with K-hi? If we bet, we are folding. I don't see much value here with two villains, esp one being unknown. With just the one fish, we expect him to call with a busted flush draw, any 8 or K-hi, playing his kicker on his awesome two pair. 
|
|
#12
03-27-2006, 03:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Value-bet straight on 2-pair board?
I would probably bet/call here but checking through is not a bad thing either. In hind sight I should probably make more of these safechecks on the river but I have a bad habit of pushing the action until notified that I am no longer ahead.
|
|
#13
03-27-2006, 09:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Value-bet straight on 2-pair board?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I think bet calling is a better line. [/ QUOTE ] what are we beating when we get c/r here? a total bluff with K-hi? If we bet, we are folding. I don't see much value here with two villains, esp one being unknown. With just the one fish, we expect him to call with a busted flush draw, any 8 or K-hi, playing his kicker on his awesome two pair. [/ QUOTE ] The more I read these responses, the more I think that checking through is probably right. Both of my opponents had crap busted draws. Results oriented I know, but if I bet I wasn't getting called by either one of them (I don't think at least). In any case, if one decision or the other is a mistake, it's a small one at best.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
