#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker Hand Reviewer - Alpha Test
[ QUOTE ]
I'd like to see some improvement in the UI. Move the buttons to a toolbar and some panels/resizing ability of the hand listbox. [/ QUOTE ] I am not sure exactly what you are proposing here. Maybe if you drew me a picture? Or better yet, download the source from the forge and send me your proposed fixes. [img]/images/graemlins/cool.gif[/img] [ QUOTE ] Also, I've pretty much got PokerStars hand history files parsed using regex to add to an xml file. Do you plan on making the different hand converters providers or some other type of pluggable feature? jjpike [/ QUOTE ] Short answer: Yes, more parsers are on the list. Long Answer: Some moderately time consuming work needs to be done first. The current parsers needs to be abstracted to a base class and the UI needs a way to pick which loaded parses it's going to use. The current parser uses regex. Translating hands into an XML format is also an idea that I had, but didn't follow through with. It's probably a better overall approach and I am considering a retro-fit before it's too late. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker Hand Reviewer - Alpha Test
I'll download the source and try to modify it this weekend.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker Hand Reviewer - Alpha Test
I downloaded, modified and emailed you the modified source.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker Hand Reviewer - Alpha Test
I don't think the Hand Reviewer is showing mucked hands.
Neat program though! -Matthew |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker Hand Reviewer - Alpha Test
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think the Hand Reviewer is showing mucked hands. Neat program though! -Matthew [/ QUOTE ] Can you PM me a hand history where you think it didn't show you something it should have? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker Hand Reviewer - Alpha Test
just looking at the screeny, you should add the stack size.
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker Hand Reviewer - Alpha Test
[ QUOTE ]
You should add the stack size. [/ QUOTE ] Good point. I am a limit player so I don't generally think about the stack sizes. In fact, I filtered them out. I will put it on the list to fix. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker Hand Reviewer - Alpha Test
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You should add the stack size. [/ QUOTE ] Good point. I am a limit player so I don't generally think about the stack sizes. In fact, I filtered them out. I will put it on the list to fix. [/ QUOTE ] It should be an option, just like in the HandConverters just for this reason, we don't care with Limit, and it means a lot in NL. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker Hand Reviewer - Alpha Test
This program is awesome! However, Pot Size is critical to proper review. Are you adding this to the program and if so, when can we expect it? Thanks man!
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Poker Hand Reviewer - Alpha Test
[ QUOTE ]
This program is awesome! However, Pot Size is critical to proper review. Are you adding this to the program and if so, when can we expect it? Thanks man! [/ QUOTE ] We are having some technical problems with Sourceforge this week. Pot Size is high on the list. We are working on revamping the parsing engine. That will take about a week. Once that part is done, getting the pot size will be trivial. JJPike and ThunderEagle are working on the UI and have made some nice improvements. Keep the feedback coming. It really motivates us to keep working on the program. Please feel free to log bus and feature requests in this thread, by PM, or at http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/handreview -D |
|
|