|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Do you tan? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
7 | 16.28% |
| No |
  
|
14 | 32.56% |
| No, but my significant other does |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| No, but I'd consider it |
  
|
4 | 9.30% |
| Tanning is gay, dude |
  
|
18 | 41.86% |
| Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
#1
11-29-2007, 11:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] oh btw, ... and implement the bet pot button plz! [/ QUOTE ] no betpot plzzz! [/ QUOTE ] Why not? I find that the 'bet pot' button on UB causes fish to make terrible bet sizing errors, particularly early game. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's more often the other way around. Fish play closer to correct when they don't get to pick their bet sizes and just mash the pot button. 
|
|
#2
11-29-2007, 11:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] oh btw, ... and implement the bet pot button plz! [/ QUOTE ] no betpot plzzz! [/ QUOTE ] Why not? I find that the 'bet pot' button on UB causes fish to make terrible bet sizing errors, particularly early game. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's more often the other way around. Fish play closer to correct when they don't get to pick their bet sizes and just mash the pot button. [/ QUOTE ] Agree on this. Especially if they're raising after a limper or two
|
|
#3
11-29-2007, 11:39 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
I don't like ten mans. Ten mans = less skill required since you end up folding more hands yet the sng takes the same amount of time, so there are less profitable plays to be made = less edge for the good player.
|
|
#4
11-29-2007, 12:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
I don't like ten mans. Ten mans = less skill required since you end up folding more hands yet the sng takes the same amount of time, so there are less profitable plays to be made = less edge for the good player. [/ QUOTE ] So why dont you play 6 mans??
|
|
#5
11-29-2007, 12:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't like ten mans. Ten mans = less skill required since you end up folding more hands yet the sng takes the same amount of time, so there are less profitable plays to be made = less edge for the good player. [/ QUOTE ] So why dont you play 6 mans?? [/ QUOTE ] Screw that, HU for rolls, LDO.
|
|
#6
11-29-2007, 07:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
I think that the 150/300+25(30?) would be a good idea. I also think increase the ante on 200/400..hmm..perhaps to 40 ? Then 300/600+60. No ante increase from 100/200 doesn't make sense.
One thing I always thought was a bit awkward is the big jump from $6.5 to $16 making it tough for bankroll builders to move quickly up. Add a $10+0.7 SnG or something, a 2.5x buyin jump doesn't make sense. I think 10man is an OK idea. Always seemed to work well on party. I think something could be improved on the timebank, both to help multitablers from timing out and automatically sit out and possibly lose their buyin and to keep players from stalling which seems to be a problem. A solution to being sitout on one table would be to alert the player that they are sitting out at a table, if they are active on other tables. -Option to automatically leave a table when busting out. Thank you for a good client.
|
|
#7
11-29-2007, 08:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
I think something could be improved on the timebank, both to help multitablers from timing out and automatically sit out and possibly lose their buyin and to keep players from stalling which seems to be a problem. A solution to being sitout on one table would be to alert the player that they are sitting out at a table, if they are active on other tables.
-Option to automatically leave a table when busting out. [/ QUOTE ] I personally would love both of these things.
|
|
#8
11-30-2007, 12:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
One thing I always thought was a bit awkward is the big jump from $6.5 to $16 making it tough for bankroll builders to move quickly up. Add a $10+0.7 SnG or something, a 2.5x buyin jump doesn't make sense. [/ QUOTE ] Good idea and I'm totally OK with that
|
|
#9
11-29-2007, 11:52 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 1-table S&Gs - your feedback requested
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] oh btw, ... and implement the bet pot button plz! [/ QUOTE ] no betpot plzzz! [/ QUOTE ] Why not? I find that the 'bet pot' button on UB causes fish to make terrible bet sizing errors, particularly early game. [/ QUOTE ] I think it's more often the other way around. Fish play closer to correct when they don't get to pick their bet sizes and just mash the pot button. [/ QUOTE ] Agree on this. Especially if they're raising after a limper or two [/ QUOTE ] Guess we'll just have to disagree on this. In my experience, a 'bet pot' button encourages super LAG play from donks who have no idea about pot control and just either min bet or pot bet every time. These players will frequently stack off with draws and top pair hands very early in a sng.
|
|
|
|
Hybrid Mode
