Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-27-2007, 02:55 AM
tshort tshort is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,143
Default Re: Geometric Series

[ QUOTE ]
Hi again, quick question regarding (a+bi)/(c+di)

What is the justification for dropping the imaginary part? i.e. Only using (ac+bd)/(c^2+d^2) and dropping the i[(ac+bd)/(c^2+d^2)] component

[/ QUOTE ]

Original equation:

2 * Sum[ (1/3)^t cos(wt) ]

You then perform a manipulation trick adding in (1/3)^t sin(wt) so it is summable by geometric series (2 * Sum[ ((1/3) e^iw)^t]). This equation is a new equation different from the original one. You have added an imaginary part to the equation so you may sum the series. You then drop the imaginary part after you sum the series and are left with the equal real parts.

On the other hand, you may use the identity:

cos(z) = (e^(iz)+e^(-iz)) / 2

Then your series becomes:

Sum[(1/3*e^(iw))^t] + Sum[(1/3*e^(-iw))^t]

Which sums to:

-(e^iw)/((e^iw)-3) + 1/(3e^(iw)-1)

Algebraic manipulations will then yield your desired equation (using (e^iw = cos w + i sin w):

1-3Cos(w)/(3Cos(w)-5)

In this second method you don't have to worry about adding in an imaginary part and later dropping it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.