#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: co vs. button against 2p2er
without history this pretty much blows imo
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: co vs. button against 2p2er
I think we can vbet AT on this river fwiw but 7T is too thin.
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: co vs. button against 2p2er
[ QUOTE ]
I think we can vbet AT on this river fwiw but 7T is too thin. [/ QUOTE ] vbetting A10 is pretty bad on this board, Jem is obv not vbetting |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: co vs. button against 2p2er
wrschultz, just out of curiosity, why do you think c/cing is best on turn? If we have intentions of putting money into the pot, why not be the aggressor, I think we have a better chance of winning the hand there before the draws and possible two pair come in. In this hand, I really think we're ahead until the river comes in. TPTK is a good hand on this flop, its possible we're up against a straight, but i doubt he plays a straight like this.
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: co vs. button against 2p2er
i'd c/c turn. let him float and bluff with his A hi or whatever.
and the river bet is terrible. check and hope to beat his missed draw or stubborn 55. if he bets then fold unhappily. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: co vs. button against 2p2er
i have no idea what is happening on the turn and on the river...
c/c turn prolly and c/c or c/f river |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: co vs. button against 2p2er
How could AT be a value bet but not T7? He has QT or 9T that often? No.
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: co vs. button against 2p2er
I'm convinced 90% of you have no idea wtf is going on.
Either we play totally different games or this forum is in worse shape than I thought. Betting the river for value? Really? I'm confused. Edit: I think we might be able to have an interesting discussion for check/call turn vs betting actually. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: co vs. button against 2p2er
The forum is in bad shape, apparently. And I see absolutely zero merit in betting the turn, pretty much.
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: co vs. button against 2p2er
[ QUOTE ]
The forum is in bad shape, apparently. And I see absolutely zero merit in betting the turn, pretty much. [/ QUOTE ] You know, looking back I agree that there isn't much discussion. Fairly simply check/call. Not sure why I was thinking otherwise for a second. |
|
|