|
|
|
|
#1
11-26-2007, 02:48 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag
oh one thing i lost my train of thought but the thing about not knowing which draw he has puts us in a bad spot this deep because he can value bet us to death and maybe give up if he misses... so getting all in vs whatever would be preferable obviously.
|
|
#2
11-26-2007, 02:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag
well if i were to play back at him with air/draw in this instance, i would probably do it by just calling flop anyway. im not saying its a bad idea to play back and make it look like im FOS, but if i were to pull a move here, id float his c/r, not 3bet it most of the time anyway.
|
|
#3
11-26-2007, 02:53 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag
then shove over any turn bet in that case. i dont know if that's what u did but that's what u should do.
|
|
#4
11-26-2007, 02:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag
one more thing is SB is not fish but just reg or something, i check this flop back with this type of player this deep who's liable to c/r a ton of [censored] a fair amount of the time. with fish in tho you lose too much value i guess
|
|
#5
11-26-2007, 03:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag
yeah i shoved, he had 85. anyway if he WAS full of [censored], im fairly certain he would fire turn anyway. and thats like hundreds and hundreds of dollars we are missing out on by threebetting flop. like i guess that if u had some weird fetish that u just HAD to re-rebluff dudes on suspicious boards, u could re-raise with AA here to balance but i think doing that constantly is pretty awful. so i like the floating more.
god im tired.
|
|
#6
11-26-2007, 03:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag
if my rhetorics are a bit fuzzy, its because i just played 13k hands with no rest in between. i cant think straight.
|
|
#7
11-26-2007, 03:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag
btw im not arguing that its an easy stack-off, it was just a checkup. 3bet vs float is what interests me now.
|
|
#8
11-26-2007, 03:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag
[ QUOTE ]
yeah i shoved, he had 85. anyway if he WAS full of [censored], im fairly certain he would fire turn anyway. and thats like hundreds and hundreds of dollars we are missing out on by threebetting flop. like i guess that if u had some weird fetish that u just HAD to re-rebluff dudes on suspicious boards, u could re-raise with AA here to balance but i think doing that constantly is pretty awful. so i like the floating more. god im tired. [/ QUOTE ] instead of hoping to get his $300 turn cont bet and trying to decide which turns and rivers hit his range, we can get $1100+ in with dominated hands and draws that have alot less equity than they might think (like KJcc) we have the nuts on this board and im trying to get it in asap
|
|
#9
11-26-2007, 03:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag
u make it sound like the one half of a buyin is unimportant. it's HALF A BUYIN. and if we have the nuts on this board, there shouldnt really be that many turn cards dangerous enough to change our opinion of our hand that much imo.
|
|
#10
11-26-2007, 03:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: pretty gross AA decision vs tough lag
[ QUOTE ]
yeah i shoved, he had 85. anyway if he WAS full of [censored], im fairly certain he would fire turn anyway. and thats like hundreds and hundreds of dollars we are missing out on by threebetting flop. like i guess that if u had some weird fetish that u just HAD to re-rebluff dudes on suspicious boards, u could re-raise with AA here to balance but i think doing that constantly is pretty awful. so i like the floating more. god im tired. [/ QUOTE ] you werent drawing dead what more could you want
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
