|
|
|
|
#1
11-21-2007, 03:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PBP: Renton Theorem zohmygod
Is this a new concept? I approach NLHE by playing for the big pots, not grinding out small bets. Deceiving my opponent about the strength of my hand, as well as widening the range of hands he can put me on is always my goal to maximize the profit on those big hands. I play for the big pots. It helps that the live game I play in has tons of implied odds. But is the concept you have conveyed here really a Renton Theory original? If so, I have been implementing your theory without realizing I owed you credit. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
|
|
#2
11-21-2007, 03:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PBP: Renton Theorem zohmygod
[ QUOTE ]
Is this a new concept? I approach NLHE by playing for the big pots, not grinding out small bets. Deceiving my opponent about the strength of my hand, as well as widening the range of hands he can put me on is always my goal to maximize the profit on those big hands. I play for the big pots. It helps that the live game I play in has tons of implied odds. But is the concept you have conveyed here really a Renton Theory original? If so, I have been implementing your theory without realizing I owed you credit. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Also if it weren't obvious the fact that im even calling it a theorem is basically a joke, because its a super simple aspect of poker that pretty much any decent player understands at least on some level. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#3
11-21-2007, 03:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PBP: Renton Theorem zohmygod
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Is this a new concept? I approach NLHE by playing for the big pots, not grinding out small bets. Deceiving my opponent about the strength of my hand, as well as widening the range of hands he can put me on is always my goal to maximize the profit on those big hands. I play for the big pots. It helps that the live game I play in has tons of implied odds. But is the concept you have conveyed here really a Renton Theory original? If so, I have been implementing your theory without realizing I owed you credit. [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Also if it weren't obvious the fact that im even calling it a theorem is basically a joke, because its a super simple aspect of poker that pretty much any decent player understands at least on some level. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Yes, quoting a post made after my post in response to my post is kinda silly. I saw that post already, and now for the seond time. thanks.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
