#1
|
|||
|
|||
(39) BLUFF no. 3
Villain is 29/6 and we have some hands together.
Of the three so far, this one seems the least interesting, and maybe even standard? Poker Stars, $36 + $3 NL Hold'em Tournament, 10/20 Blinds, 6 Players LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter UTG: 1,420 Hero (MP): 1,490 CO: 2,210 BTN: 1,280 SB: 1,120 BB: 1,480 Pre-Flop: (30) 5[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 5[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] dealt to Hero (MP) UTG folds, <font color="red">Hero raises to 70</font>, CO folds, BTN calls 70, 2 folds Flop: (170) 8[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets 140</font>, BTN calls 140 Turn: (450) J[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) Hero checks, BTN checks River: (450) A[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (2 Players) <font color="red">Hero bets 300</font>, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3
what range do you put him on?
what hands do you expect him to fold? what hands do you expect him to call? //edit I limp 22-99 at 10/20 and I rarely bluff in the early levels since it's a waste of chips most of the time. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3
5s are beat here
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3
[ QUOTE ]
5s are beat here [/ QUOTE ] Dya think? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3
[ QUOTE ]
5s are beat here [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3 [/ QUOTE ] This guy is a [censored] genius I tell you! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: (39) BLUFF no. 3
and mike, i dont like it too much in this spot. i understand the thinking behind it but the 39 game play and this players stats lead me to believe on this board people still remain stationy, and i dont think we have as much FE as we'd like to think.
|
|
|