|
View Poll Results: QB? | |||
Vick v. NO | 8 | 80.00% | |
Kitna v. Mia | 2 | 20.00% | |
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd Chance: Need A Calling Range v Shaun
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 55+, A7+, K8+, QJ. If you lose your stack takes a big blow and you lose the ability to do multiple things. Compounded with the fact that if Shaun really is shoving that wide of a range you could probably find a much better spot in the next orbit or two, but I don't really think he's shoving as wide a range as you guys are thinking. In a vacuum I think it's fine but this has everything to do with game dynamic and it's hard to account for that. I'm going with feel and that's the range I get from feel. [/ QUOTE ] This range is cEV neutral if Shaun is pushing the top 7.5% of hands. I think most people in this thread think he's pushing closer to 75% than 7.5%. I'll pass up a marginal spot for 1/2 my stack for the reasons you stated, but A2o isn't marginal here IMO. [/ QUOTE ] I just realized that this is the 2nd chance and that there are antes. Disregard my past statements, call with whatever you want now. I thought it was the million. [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd Chance: Need A Calling Range v Shaun
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] C, he's a horse of mine so I am more likely to play tighter vs him in the bb [/ QUOTE ] I'm pretty sure playing differently against someone because you own a piece of their action is a serious faux-pas. [/ QUOTE ] yeah seriously, wtf? Also, I think I tend to fold too much in these spots, thanks (djk in particular) for the posts. [/ QUOTE ] lol this is the reason I told Adam his call was bad. shaun [censored] deeb |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd Chance: Need A Calling Range v Shaun
team waff1ecrush.... team collusion???
|
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd Chance: Need A Calling Range v Shaun
dont hate the playa hate the game... or hate shaun or something
|
#65
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd Chance: Need A Calling Range v Shaun
[ QUOTE ]
team waff1ecrush.... team collusion??? [/ QUOTE ] For example : PokerStars Game #13349088827: Tournament #67350656, $150+$12 Hold'em No Limit - Level VI (100/200) - 2007/11/19 - 22:34:14 (ET) Table '67350656 16' 9-max Seat #7 is the button Seat 1: bigmacfan (3169 in chips) Seat 2: RJAYC (8951 in chips) Seat 3: THE__D__RY (1955 in chips) Seat 4: tomanymucks! (6742 in chips) Seat 5: cool0813 (4030 in chips) Seat 6: AKAtheDON420 (8107 in chips) Seat 7: co3730 (7365 in chips) Seat 8: shaundeeb (4752 in chips) Seat 9: THAY3R (1891 in chips) is sitting out shaundeeb: posts small blind 100 THAY3R: posts big blind 200 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to THAY3R [7c Qc] THAY3R is connected THAY3R has returned bigmacfan: folds RJAYC: folds THE__D__RY: folds tomanymucks!: folds cool0813: folds AKAtheDON420: folds co3730: folds shaundeeb: raises 4552 to 4752 and is all-in THAY3R: calls 1691 and is all-in *** FLOP *** [4s 2h 3s] shaundeeb said, "get there" *** TURN *** [4s 2h 3s] [Js] *** RIVER *** [4s 2h 3s Js] [Ah] shaundeeb said, "**" *** SHOW DOWN *** shaundeeb: shows [8s 9h] (high card Ace) THAY3R: shows [7c Qc] (high card Ace - Queen kicker) THAY3R collected 3782 from pot THAY3R said, "WAFFLE CRUSHED" *** SUMMARY *** Total pot 3782 | Rake 0 Board [4s 2h 3s Js Ah] Seat 1: bigmacfan folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 2: RJAYC folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 3: THE__D__RY folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 4: tomanymucks! folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 5: cool0813 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 6: AKAtheDON420 folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 7: co3730 (button) folded before Flop (didn't bet) Seat 8: shaundeeb (small blind) showed [8s 9h] and lost with high card Ace Seat 9: THAY3R (big blind) showed [7c Qc] and won (3782) with high card Ace |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd Chance: Need A Calling Range v Shaun
you guys dont back each other tho, horrible example
|
#67
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd Chance: Need A Calling Range v Shaun
fwiw i've hung out/played online/am backed by shaun and thayer a bunch and this is the first i've ever seen/heard of shaun doing/say something like that.
definitely not 'team collusion' just shaun [censored] deeb typing whatever random BS to defend his first statement that DJK's range sucked. I really doubt his horse being in the BB changed his range at all. this was an after the fact thing e added on to try and make a point (which he was dead wrong about - djk's range was money) |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd Chance: Need A Calling Range v Shaun
shhhhhhhhhhhhh ray thats not the point. when shaundeeb admits to softplaying you run with it.
|
#69
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd Chance: Need A Calling Range v Shaun
I know Connor and co are just messing around and I laughed a little bit when I read the last few posts..
If anything I feel like Shaun/Thayer would steal more liberally from me because they know I almost never call OOP and am pretty patient/tight when in the 5-20BB zone. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2nd Chance: Need A Calling Range v Shaun
If any w.afflecrush members are looking to be backed by someone who doesn't promote collusion, shoot me a PM
|
|
|