![]() |
|
#21
|
|||
|
|||
|
Nielso,
You are not God's gift to SSNL. Here are attributes of GOOD posts/posters: 1) Brings up unique topics of discussion. 2) Rephrases old topics in an easier to understand way. 3) Funny/ otherwise entertaining/intesting. Examples: "Another way to look at playing out of the bb" (2) "Theory: bluffing frequencies" (1) Bad posts: "I flipped 100 coins and (poorly) explained gambler's fallacy" Good post: "Let's look into Gambler's Fallacy and what it means to SSNL using an adequate sample and relating it to multiple aspects of poker" Bad post: "Vaguely explaining generalized steps of learning and development" Good post: "Explaining how you can take these steps to learn and develop specific areas of your SSNL game." Nielso, I'm not sure why I havn't ignored you yet. I don't think you add much to SSNL but I believe you're a very intelligent person. I would like to see your posts tie more into specific poker examples instead of being too broad to incite good discussion. |
|
|