|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $18,925 beat
[ QUOTE ]
[x] didn't lose a full buy-in [/ QUOTE ] [x] is really [censored] stupid. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $18,925 beat
[/ QUOTE ][x] [ ] is really [censored] stupid. [/ QUOTE ] FYP |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $18,925 beat
[x] Better school teacher than poker player
[x] Los Angeles [ ] Eazy E |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $18,925 beat
-$1892.5/hr is probably sustainable. Then again, I don't think I've played in a commerce 1/2 game with more than 15k on me so I don't think I can break this record.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $18,925 beat
lolimit
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $18,925 beat
how do you lose $5 in a 100/200 game?
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $18,925 beat
[ QUOTE ]
how do you lose $5 in a 100/200 game? [/ QUOTE ] i have been know to tip. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $18,925 beat
[ QUOTE ]
how do you lose $5 in a 100/200 game? [/ QUOTE ] rake/tips |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $18,925 beat
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [x] didn't lose a full buy-in [/ QUOTE ] [x] is really [censored] stupid. [/ QUOTE ] An argument could be made that the fact that you were playing limit is stupider than this man was for thinking you weren't. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: $18,925 beat
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [x] didn't lose a full buy-in [/ QUOTE ] [x] is really [censored] stupid. [/ QUOTE ] An argument could be made that the fact that you were playing limit is stupider than this man was for thinking you weren't. [/ QUOTE ] an argument can also be made that the earth is flat, but that argument, like the one you suggest, is also completely retarded. |
|
|