AQs vs a Reg - i hate making big folds

[jordiepop]

anyone check the turn back?

[tubasteve]

[ QUOTE ]
anyone check the turn back?

[/ QUOTE ]

god no

[shpanko]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
anyone check the turn back?

[/ QUOTE ]

god no

[/ QUOTE ]

Explain yourself tubasteve, What are you putting villain on here where betting the turn is correct? How many Qx hands are in his overcalling range pf? What is he likely calling our flop bet with?

[orange]

agreed w/ shpanko. i think a turn check has to at least be considered here. honestly, i think he c/r-es any Q on the flop and the amount of Qs in his range are slim. KQs/QJs? v. a tighter passive reg, i doubt we'll be getting 3 streets of value v. like...TT or whatever.

[shpanko]

Those were my thoughts. I feel like villain either has:

1.) Spades and is going to c/r

or

2.) A mid range pocket pair like 77-TT


If he has a worse Q he's usually c/r'ing the flop or leading the turn imo. That's why I seriously consider a turn check.

[pineapple888]

[ QUOTE ]
agreed w/ shpanko. i think a turn check has to at least be considered here. honestly, i think he c/r-es any Q on the flop and the amount of Qs in his range are slim. KQs/QJs? v. a tighter passive reg, i doubt we'll be getting 3 streets of value v. like...TT or whatever.

[/ QUOTE ]

Pot control FTW. We are getting value from almost nothing on the turn, and we are protecting vs. almost nothing.

[shpanko]

Me and Pineapple rarely agree so you know that turn check is prob a good line [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[crunchi]

I also agree with checking the turn.

Think about how many combos of Q he can have. AT BEST around 10?

Compare this to the combos of flushes and boats. Probably 25+