|
|
|
|
#3
11-15-2007, 05:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1 Cowboys 2 Giants 3 Packers 4 Saints Too much hate on Giants + Saints. [/ QUOTE ] Methinks you don't understand how these rankings work. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe if OP would post how the rankings work so we would all kno.....oh. 
|
|
#4
11-15-2007, 05:42 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Methinks you don't understand how these rankings work. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe if OP would post how the rankings work so we would all kno.....oh. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] SE
|
|
#5
11-15-2007, 05:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1 Cowboys 2 Giants 3 Packers 4 Saints Too much hate on Giants + Saints. [/ QUOTE ] Methinks you don't understand how these rankings work. [/ QUOTE ] who reads disclaimers?
|
|
#6
11-18-2007, 01:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1 Cowboys 2 Giants 3 Packers 4 Saints Too much hate on Giants + Saints. [/ QUOTE ] Methinks you don't understand how these rankings work. [/ QUOTE ] I do, my rankings clearly arent the same style as his but mine are more to the point. Regardless its rather obvious that the discrepancy between the Saints (4th on my list) to his (10th) is large no matter what type of style you use.
|
|
#8
11-16-2007, 02:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
1 Cowboys 2 Giants 3 Packers 4 Saints Too much hate on Giants + Saints. [/ QUOTE ] besides the fact that the rankings don't work this way, how can you rank the Giants above the Packers when the Packers beat the Giants, have played a tougher schedule, have a two-game better record, and after last week, are probably playing better football right now. Also, how can you rank a 4-5 team that just got beat handily at home by a consensus bottom three team in the #4 spot?
|
|
#9
11-18-2007, 02:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] 1 Cowboys 2 Giants 3 Packers 4 Saints Too much hate on Giants + Saints. [/ QUOTE ] besides the fact that the rankings don't work this way, how can you rank the Giants above the Packers when the Packers beat the Giants, [/ QUOTE ] It was Week 2 everybody knows Giants had a slow start. So do you rank the Chargers > Colts? They beat them, they are better! No. [ QUOTE ] hae played a tougher schedule, have a two-game better record, and after last week, are probably playing better football right now. [/ QUOTE ] Packers: Week 1: vs Eagles (Win 16-13) - got very lucky, Eagles fumbled twice on returns? (Loss) Weeek 2: vs Giants (Win 35-13) - Big Win (Win) Week 3: vs Chargers (Win 31-24) - Didn't see the game so I'll give them credit for the nice win (Win). Week 4: vs Vikings (Win 23-16) - Complete BS "incomplete pass" on a fumble that was returned for a TD, packers later scored after the non call due to a stupid ref blowing it dead. 14 pt turn around (Loss) Week 5: vs Bears (Loss 27-20) - They Lost to a bad team (Loss) Week 6: vs Redskins (Win 17-13) - They won, but S. Moss had to do everything humanly possible to make sure he blew it for the Skins, (lots of drops, 1 fumble returned for a TD + I think he did some other dumb stuff) (Loss) Week 7: Bye Week 8: vs Broncos (win 19-13) - BS Holding call brings back S. Young TD or was that a diff game [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img], regardless the Broncos Left Guard hit the ball out of cutler's hand while running on the 1yd line. That is AT LEAST 3 points, about 6pts of equity. They ended up going into OT, nvr would of been in OT if it wasn't for that fluke (Loss). Week 9: vs Chiefs - Win 33-22 - Didn't see this game so idk, benefit of the doubt (Win) Week 10: vs Vikings - Killed the Vikings (Win). My guess at what their record would be if they played the season over and over to get rid of their sick good variance they have been having puts them at around 4-5. With good luck they could be 6-3. There is obviously a lot of variance in football everybody would agree with that. Yes some would say "they have found a way to win" or in some cases the Refs found a way to let them win. Either way they are this years Bears. Super lucky, and overrated. After all that I still have them ranked 3rd best in the NFC! [ QUOTE ] Also, how can you rank a 4-5 team that just got beat handily at home by a consensus bottom three team in the #4 spot? [/ QUOTE ] Well you seem to rank a team that deserves to be 4-5 (packers) at (2nd) place? in the NFC so 4th dosnt sound too crazy to me.
|
|
#10
11-18-2007, 03:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
Four of the six Giants wins came against the Atlanta Falcons, the San Fransisco 49ers, the New York Jets, and the Miami Dolphins aka 4 of the 5 worst teams in the league. And LOL at calling some of these Packers close wins a loss when you have no idea what would have happened. The 1st Vikings game was a 2 TD lead until a late TD by the Vikings closed the gap, and then the Packers fumbled it to give the Vikings a chance to tie it. Hardly a loss! By that logic, the Giants close win against the Dolphins and their 14 point comeback vs. the Skins should be losses, and the Packers loss to the Bears should be a win because they handed the game to the Bears on a silver platter. The Packers 4-5 in the NFC? LOL LOL LOL!
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
