|
|
|
|
#1
11-15-2007, 03:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
I'd move Detroit over Washington and Chicago over Carolina for sure and maybe even over Philly. [/ QUOTE ] LOL at Chicago over Philly. Good one. Philly has 3-4 wins left on their schedule. Probably closer to 3. Chicago has maybe 2. 
|
|
#2
11-15-2007, 04:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I'd move Detroit over Washington and Chicago over Carolina for sure and maybe even over Philly. [/ QUOTE ] LOL at Chicago over Philly. Good one. Philly has 3-4 wins left on their schedule. Probably closer to 3. Chicago has maybe 2. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe 2??? Set the line at 2. I take over, you take under. 2 is a push. Bet? 99,420 and counting
|
|
#3
11-15-2007, 04:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
Even if I believe that statement, it's still a bad bet for me. That statement doesn't say "Chicago will win 0 or 1 games more often than they win 3-7 games."
(I'd rather bet with you on Eagles finishing with more wins than the Bears.)
|
|
#4
11-15-2007, 04:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'd move Detroit over Washington and Chicago over Carolina for sure and maybe even over Philly. [/ QUOTE ] LOL at Chicago over Philly. Good one. Philly has 3-4 wins left on their schedule. Probably closer to 3. Chicago has maybe 2. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe 2??? Set the line at 2. I take over, you take under. 2 is a push. Bet? 99,420 and counting [/ QUOTE ] I'd take the under on 3, but 2 is definitely a bad bet. If I could get +110 on under 2.5 I think I'd take it.
|
|
#6
11-15-2007, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'd move Detroit over Washington and Chicago over Carolina for sure and maybe even over Philly. [/ QUOTE ] LOL at Chicago over Philly. Good one. Philly has 3-4 wins left on their schedule. Probably closer to 3. Chicago has maybe 2. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe 2??? Set the line at 2. I take over, you take under. 2 is a push. Bet? 99,420 and counting [/ QUOTE ] I'd take the under on 3, but 2 is definitely a bad bet. If I could get +110 on under 2.5 I think I'd take it. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. I probably should have said "most likely" and not "maybe", because I think 2 is the most likely win total the remainder of the year. They're most likely only going to be favored in two of those games (vs. Denver, vs. NO), and those will be close.
|
|
#8
11-15-2007, 05:39 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
my favorite part about your rankings every week is that i get to read about how good dallas is... mmm tony romo [/ QUOTE ] *sigh* My favorite part of the rankings used to be writing about how good the Eagles were. Oh well. *sigh*
|
|
#9
11-15-2007, 06:49 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'd move Detroit over Washington and Chicago over Carolina for sure and maybe even over Philly. [/ QUOTE ] LOL at Chicago over Philly. Good one. Philly has 3-4 wins left on their schedule. Probably closer to 3. Chicago has maybe 2. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe 2??? Set the line at 2. I take over, you take under. 2 is a push. Bet? 99,420 and counting [/ QUOTE ] I'd take the under on 3, but 2 is definitely a bad bet. If I could get +110 on under 2.5 I think I'd take it. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. I probably should have said "most likely" and not "maybe", because I think 2 is the most likely win total the remainder of the year. They're most likely only going to be favored in two of those games (vs. Denver, vs. NO), and those will be close. [/ QUOTE ] I'd take the over 2.5 for even money if anyone is interested. 99,416 and counting
|
|
#10
11-15-2007, 07:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: PokerFink\'s NFC Rankings (Week 10)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I'd move Detroit over Washington and Chicago over Carolina for sure and maybe even over Philly. [/ QUOTE ] LOL at Chicago over Philly. Good one. Philly has 3-4 wins left on their schedule. Probably closer to 3. Chicago has maybe 2. [/ QUOTE ] Maybe 2??? Set the line at 2. I take over, you take under. 2 is a push. Bet? 99,420 and counting [/ QUOTE ] I'd take the under on 3, but 2 is definitely a bad bet. If I could get +110 on under 2.5 I think I'd take it. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. I probably should have said "most likely" and not "maybe", because I think 2 is the most likely win total the remainder of the year. They're most likely only going to be favored in two of those games (vs. Denver, vs. NO), and those will be close. [/ QUOTE ] I'd take the over 2.5 for even money if anyone is interested. 99,416 and counting [/ QUOTE ] Let's do it up. I'm not a high roller like you, but I'm up for $50 on under 2.5 wins.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
