Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-10-2007, 06:29 PM
Jon_AK Jon_AK is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 98
Default $5.50 - Do you think this re-steal attempt was too risky?

I played this hand and thought I did a good job but other people don't think so much... I just couldn't give this guy any credit (even though I didn't have any reads on him)

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t1600 (8 handed) Poker Stars Converter Tool from FlopTurnRiver.com (Format: 2+2 Forums)

Button (t27681)
SB (t48477)
Jon_AK (t87069)
UTG (t24368)
UTG+1 (t30279)
MP1 (t21464)
MP2 (t11950)
CO (t16700)

Preflop: Jon_AK is BB with J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 4[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img].
<font color="#666666">6 folds</font>, <font color="#CC3333">SB raises to t4800</font>, Jon_AK calls t3200.

Flop: (t9050) 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], 6[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(2 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">SB bets t6500</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Jon_AK raises to t16000</font>
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2007, 02:39 PM
dkgojackets dkgojackets is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Georgia Tech
Posts: 1,851
Default Re: $5.50 - Do you think this re-steal attempt was too risky?

hmmm, I kinda like it. Unlikely that he hit, and just calling would be a third of his stack.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-11-2007, 02:47 PM
M1cKmAcK M1cKmAcK is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: poker prison
Posts: 203
Default Re: $5.50 - Do you think this re-steal attempt was too risky?

Some people cant fold 77 or A6 here. Problem is unless you've been at his table for awhile you don't know what he showsdown in this spot. Obv if he calls it's time to count your losses and shut down. I fold this pre b/c you don't have any reads on him. Kind of a no-sense gamble isn't it?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-11-2007, 02:53 PM
DeuceSeven DeuceSeven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: deuceseven.blogspot.com
Posts: 1,765
Default Re: $5.50 - Do you think this re-steal attempt was too risky?

First I'd like a read before I start making plays. If you plan on taking this away, I like a call on the flop then if he checks the turn you can fire out 8k, this is a cheaper alternative to expending 16k with your flop raise.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-11-2007, 03:18 PM
ChipSpeak ChipSpeak is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 432
Default Re: $5.50 - Do you think this re-steal attempt was too risky?

Why are we making this play without reads, we just put 20k of our stack in with nothing, no reads and no hand?
fold this pre, if you want to make a play, repop pre flop we could have repopped (with a read preferrably) for 12-13k and found out how much he liked this hand, our stack should keep him in check.
As played, I agree with Deuce, if you want to continue here, float him and flat call that flop, he'll show you how much he likes his hand on the turn.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-11-2007, 03:22 PM
RonFezBuddy RonFezBuddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 477
Default Re: $5.50 - Do you think this re-steal attempt was too risky?

I like the post-flop steal attempt (can you get away from a 3-bet here?). This board looks harmless and you can fold to a shove.

However, I don't really like the pre-flop call. Either fold or raise. J4 is so hard to play post-flop unless you hit trips or two pair that you could be putting a lot of chips with a marginal flop. I think pre-flop fold &gt;&gt; raise &gt;&gt; call.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-11-2007, 03:26 PM
RonFezBuddy RonFezBuddy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 477
Default Re: $5.50 - Do you think this re-steal attempt was too risky?

[ QUOTE ]
First I'd like a read before I start making plays. If you plan on taking this away, I like a call on the flop then if he checks the turn you can fire out 8k, this is a cheaper alternative to expending 16k with your flop raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

But isn't this only saving him 2k while giving the opponent a chance to hit an overcard which is likely in his range? If an A, K or Q hits the turn there's a good chance he's screwed and will be putting chips in way behind. By making a move here at least, he can shut down the likely continuation bet before it turns into a real hand.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2007, 05:42 PM
DeuceSeven DeuceSeven is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: deuceseven.blogspot.com
Posts: 1,765
Default Re: $5.50 - Do you think this re-steal attempt was too risky?

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
First I'd like a read before I start making plays. If you plan on taking this away, I like a call on the flop then if he checks the turn you can fire out 8k, this is a cheaper alternative to expending 16k with your flop raise.

[/ QUOTE ]

But isn't this only saving him 2k while giving the opponent a chance to hit an overcard which is likely in his range? If an A, K or Q hits the turn there's a good chance he's screwed and will be putting chips in way behind. By making a move here at least, he can shut down the likely continuation bet before it turns into a real hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Also another way of thinking is if villain has 2 overs he only has 6 outs to make a pair. So most villains will check the turn unimproved with a non pair hand, then you can take it away. If villain has a hand or improves and leads out on the turn you don't waste that extra money raising the flop. I prefer floating as it commits less chips.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.