#1
|
|||
|
|||
50NL - representing a set
The SB is taggish, but bets about 60% of the flops after raising PF. I'd put them on TT+ AQ+ PF, after the flop I'm sure that it is JJ+. Can we ever make them fold here?
Poker Stars No Limit Holdem Ring game Blinds: $0.25/$0.50 8 players Converter Stack sizes: UTG: $49.25 UTG+1: $19.45 MP1: $14.65 MP2: $15.20 CO: $22.90 Hero: $61.02 SB: $22.89 BB: $20 Pre-flop: (8 players) Hero is Button with 7[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 8[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] UTG calls, 4 folds, Hero calls, <font color="#cc0000">SB raises to $2.5</font>, BB folds, UTG calls, Hero calls. Flop: 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] ($8, 3 players) <font color="#cc0000">SB bets $6</font>, UTG folds, <font color="#cc0000">Hero raises to $38.5</font> |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL - representing a set
Raise teh preflops. I also tend to give alot of respect to people who don't suck and raise out of the blinds because alot of people wouldn't even raise AQs here. I'd rather make a play if he raised in MP or even UTG instead.
I call the flop and reaval the turn as a diamond 6/7/8/J improves our hand. It's also hard to rep a set here, wouldn't you raise 99/TT preflop? So you're trying to rep. exactly 33? Not many people are going to narrow your range that much. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL - representing a set
Do you usually raise 6.5x on dry boards with sets?
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL - representing a set
Doesn't matter about sizing, SB has about 14 bucks left anyway, which is why you have no equity here raising. He's most likely calling off his stack here.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL - representing a set
Didn't notice stack sizes. I assumed since he called a big preflop raise, he did it for implied odds against a full stack WHICH IS THE ONLY TIME YOU SHOULD CALL A RAISE WITH 78s [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img]. That said, I think we have some FE. SB can cbet fold AK. I know if I called a preflop raise for 12% of my effective stack with 78s, there's no way I'm not shoving this flop.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 50NL - representing a set
I missed stack sizes to getting ~11:1 in implied odds with a suited connector is not enough.
|
|
|