Two Plus Two Newer Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Newer Archives > Tournament Poker > MTT Strategy
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-11-2007, 10:11 AM
Uncle_Billy Uncle_Billy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 149
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

Love these posts - seriously...

Question related to the first example of maximizing value - is there a simple math calculation you use to immediately allow you to determine the best possible bet size on early streets that ultimately sets you up to make a pot sized bet on a future street?

Or asking the question in a different way - what's your stack size in terms of bb to set yourself up this way?

Asking because I love your early example - but determining in real time in advance that "ok, I need to bet AAA on the flop to allow me to bet BBB on the turn, which then sets me up for an X-sized bet on the river that doesn't look stupid" takes a lot longer to figure out than saying "OK i have YY BB post flop, so I'm positioned well to do a TT% pot sized bet on future streets (assuming board texture and hand reading cooperates) with the hope of getting it in on ZZ street"...

Does this make sense? Or is this overly formulaic? Asking because I'm sure there's prob a shortcut that allows one to determine this at a glance (similar to counting outs and quickly estimating % probability of hitting a draw).

Awesome series - there always seems to be at least one "ah-hah" moment for me in reading these...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-11-2007, 11:21 AM
loosemmjan loosemmjan is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 72
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing



Bond:

You have helped my game in more ways then I can go into right now.

Mr Aejones your contribution, to this post, is also much appreciated.

2p2 FTW

thanks

~loose

I will elaborate more in my 1 year anniversary with 2p2 post.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-12-2007, 02:25 PM
Dave D Dave D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Suffolk Law School or Brookline
Posts: 2,886
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

[ QUOTE ]
Love these posts - seriously...

Question related to the first example of maximizing value - is there a simple math calculation you use to immediately allow you to determine the best possible bet size on early streets that ultimately sets you up to make a pot sized bet on a future street?

Or asking the question in a different way - what's your stack size in terms of bb to set yourself up this way?

Asking because I love your early example - but determining in real time in advance that "ok, I need to bet AAA on the flop to allow me to bet BBB on the turn, which then sets me up for an X-sized bet on the river that doesn't look stupid" takes a lot longer to figure out than saying "OK i have YY BB post flop, so I'm positioned well to do a TT% pot sized bet on future streets (assuming board texture and hand reading cooperates) with the hope of getting it in on ZZ street"...

Does this make sense? Or is this overly formulaic? Asking because I'm sure there's prob a shortcut that allows one to determine this at a glance (similar to counting outs and quickly estimating % probability of hitting a draw).

Awesome series - there always seems to be at least one "ah-hah" moment for me in reading these...

[/ QUOTE ]

I think what you're asking here is basically bet 60% pot on the flop, bet 1/2 pot on the turn. Adjust those numbers based on the texture (as bond says his flop bets are usually 60-75% of flop etc). Just do this and don't worry too much about looking foolish later, but just realize that if you have 1500 left and the pot is 1300, go ahead and push on the river (if you're gonna make a bet), or if you have 1200 and hte pot is 1500, same thing.

I think bond was more trying to get at the fact that if you build a pot early in the hand, it means you can get more in later, not so much that betting 1000 with 1500 behind looks transparent to the other player (although that matters too).

Definitely don't start PSB the flop just to avoid what you think are awkward sized bets later.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-12-2007, 02:26 PM
Dave D Dave D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Suffolk Law School or Brookline
Posts: 2,886
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

BTW, sorry if my post ventured into the land of hand reading, I was mostly just trying to point out things not to do and mistakes in bet sizing I often see. The hand reading aspect was incidental, and the reasons why.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-12-2007, 02:36 PM
Dave D Dave D is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Suffolk Law School or Brookline
Posts: 2,886
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

Just thought of something else. It's kinda obvious, but I'm surprised it's not in the thread.

Don't ever ever ever ever ever minraise.

The worst is if it folds to the SB, who minraises into the BB. I'm calling in the BB with like almost any two. The worst is late tourney, when I'm getting literally something like 5:1 to call.

All minraising does is give the opponent good odds to call.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-12-2007, 03:22 PM
Ship Ship McGipp Ship Ship McGipp is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: implied millionaire
Posts: 3,884
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

I skimmed this thread, a few quick clarifications:

The stack-a-donk line is not really good and overused unless you're playing clueless opponents. If poker lines were a fashion statement, stack-a-donk would have been out 15 or 18 months ago. Analogous to tournament lines, the stack-a-donk is more outdated than restealing with 7 high. Also, if you're going to check the turn to stack a donk and you whiff, YOU NEED TO CHECK THE RIVER. People traditionally don't understand that.

Another thing, someone said they'd usually check the flop with the set of sevens... no. All I can think of is no. No, no, no. No. Nah, no thanks, no, please no, no sir, no ma'am, no siree, etc. Bet.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2007, 06:07 PM
d2themfi d2themfi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 3 weeks till 21st!!!
Posts: 770
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

good post bond, def a lot of good material for small stakes players in there
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2007, 06:49 PM
jonnyd jonnyd is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: philadelphia
Posts: 859
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

this is great. thanks man
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:16 PM
Bond18 Bond18 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Blogging, you know where.
Posts: 5,444
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

[ QUOTE ]
I skimmed this thread, a few quick clarifications:

The stack-a-donk line is not really good and overused unless you're playing clueless opponents. If poker lines were a fashion statement, stack-a-donk would have been out 15 or 18 months ago. Analogous to tournament lines, the stack-a-donk is more outdated than restealing with 7 high. Also, if you're going to check the turn to stack a donk and you whiff, YOU NEED TO CHECK THE RIVER. People traditionally don't understand that.

Another thing, someone said they'd usually check the flop with the set of sevens... no. All I can think of is no. No, no, no. No. Nah, no thanks, no, please no, no sir, no ma'am, no siree, etc. Bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

I couldn't have said this better aejones. Pre UIGEA the stack-a-donk was all the rage, there was still so many clueless recreational players. These days 90% of players at mid and 100% of at high know it's a monster hand. There are just sooooo few situations where it's an appropriate line.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-12-2007, 07:44 PM
JSchnett JSchnett is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Looking for people to stake
Posts: 4,360
Default Re: Things it took me a while to learn part 8, Bet Sizing

stack-a-donk is too old and overused now. I think its better when the stacks aren't very deep and seems to work better in the late/mid stages when stacks are shallower and they can't fold after they bet and can't call your 2nd barrel very often.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.