The Engineer is yellow...

[Coy_Roy]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I can understand how he does not wish to start each post with a disclaimer that the post is not an official statement of the PPA.

[/ QUOTE ]


Although you might understand why he wouldn't want to have such a disclaimer in each post, would you also understand why/if he refused to? That is, why giving up posting here because of dislike of the disclaimer was more important than just considering it the price of working for the cause? All he has to do is tap a preprogrammed function key to add it.

[/ QUOTE ]



Bluff, would you also be willing to please sign every post you make with your title?

BluffTHIS
Mason Malmuth
Shill Extraordinaire



It would clarify to everyone immediately exactly where it is you're coming from.

[BluffTHIS!]

Not_So_Coy_Roy,

I'm not a shill for Mason but he and I do agree on most (but not all if you would read the fine points of previous debates) issues of the board makeup and transparency as they relate to the PPA. And I think it should be obvious to anyone that as this is his website, he can do as he pleases with it.

BluffTHIS!
His own man
Not affiliated with Bluff Mag or any other organization/person with "Bluff" in their title/name

[Yikes]

TE has done more than most for the movement to fully legalize poker, and has certainly done more than you Mason, the way you are treating him is horrible. He has clearly stated that he is our voice to the PPA, not the PPA's voice. He shouldn't have to have something telling people he is representing PPA when he is certainly not their voice.

[DeadMoneyDad]

[ QUOTE ]
TE has done more than most for the movement to fully legalize poker, and has certainly done more than you Mason, the way you are treating him is horrible. He has clearly stated that he is our voice to the PPA, not the PPA's voice. He shouldn't have to have something telling people he is representing PPA when he is certainly not their voice.

[/ QUOTE ]

Berge, as the Gentlemen seemed to have reached a compromise for now perhaps a lock is in order?

Sort of a statement by both parties, which is evidenced by the return to "normal" I see no interests in any more picking at this previously open wound.


D$D

[TheEngineer]

[ QUOTE ]
Berge, as the Gentlemen seemed to have reached a compromise for now perhaps a lock is in order?

Sort of a statement by both parties, which is evidenced by the return to "normal" I see no interests in any more picking at this previously open wound.


D$D

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with your point, but I'd vote to keep the thread open to keep any lingering discussion in one central location. Whatever Berge thinks is fine with me.

[DeadMoneyDad]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Berge, as the Gentlemen seemed to have reached a compromise for now perhaps a lock is in order?

Sort of a statement by both parties, which is evidenced by the return to "normal" I see no interests in any more picking at this previously open wound.


D$D

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with your point, but I'd vote to keep the thread open to keep any lingering discussion in one central location. Whatever Berge thinks is fine with me.

[/ QUOTE ]


Much more your call than mine.


D$D